H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kaoru Okamoto vs Laura Arraya H2H: 0-2
Laura Arraya holds a 2–0 lead over Kaoru Okamoto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on carpet and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Laura Arraya won the 1991 Tokyo Japan Open quarterfinal 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1991* | Tokyo Japan Open | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-4 6-4 | Kaoru Okamoto | Match data |
| Feb 1, 1991* | Tokyo Pan Pacific | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Laura Arraya | 7-6 7-5 | Kaoru Okamoto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaoru Okamoto | #225 | #75 | 14 | 1,589 | 23 | 44 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kaoru Okamoto | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 1983 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #151 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 1988 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #208 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 1989 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #115 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |