H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Kaoru Okamoto vs Sara Gomer H2H: 0-1
Sara Gomer holds a 1–0 lead over Kaoru Okamoto in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sara Gomer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sara Gomer won the 1989 Birmingham second round 6-2 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
JPN
Right-Handed
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GBR
Age 62
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 14, 1989* | Birmingham | WTA 250 | R64 | Grass | Sara Gomer | 6-2 6-2 | Kaoru Okamoto | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kaoru Okamoto | #225 | #75 | 14 | 1,589 | 23 | 44 | 34.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Sara Gomer | #317 | #46 | 18 | 1,778 | 104 | 130 | 44.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Kaoru Okamoto | Sara Gomer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1978 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | 1980 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 1980 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 7–8 | 46.7% | — | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 1981 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,441 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 6–4 | 60.0% | — | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 1983 | 3–2 | 60.0% | — | 1,473 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 3–7 | 30.0% | — | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #128 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,450 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #101 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 |
| 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #151 | 1,480 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #59 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 1987 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #107 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 18–19 | 48.6% | #72 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 |
| 1988 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #208 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 19–15 | 55.9% | #51 | 1,744 | 0 | 1 |
| 1989 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #115 | 1,508 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #124 | 1,638 | 0 | 1 |
| 1990 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #165 | 1,496 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #92 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 |
| 1991 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #183 | 1,534 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #120 | 1,660 | 0 | 1 |
| 1992 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #225 | 1,536 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #173 | 1,577 | 0 | 1 |