H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karen Krantzcke vs Ann Jones H2H: 0-5
Ann Jones holds a 5–0 lead over Karen Krantzcke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Ann Jones leads 2–0 on carpet and 2–0 on grass. Most recently, Ann Jones won the 1971 Las Vegas fourth round 7-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1971* | Las Vegas | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Ann Jones | 7-6 6-1 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1971* | Oklahoma City | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Ann Jones | 7-5 6-2 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
| Jan 26, 1971* | Milwaukee | WTA 250 | QF | Carpet | Ann Jones | 6-3 6-2 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1970* | Auckland | WTA 250 | SF | Grass | Ann Jones | 3-6 6-2 6-4 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1969* | Auckland | WTA 250 | F | Grass | Ann Jones | 6-1 6-1 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Krantzcke | — | — | — | 1,999 | 276 | 174 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Ann Jones | — | — | — | 2,178 | 254 | 64 | 79.9% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27 | 28 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Krantzcke | Ann Jones | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 50–17 | 74.6% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1969 | 66–29 | 69.5% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 1970 | 46–24 | 65.7% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 1971 | 3–15 | 16.7% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 1973 | 33–31 | 51.6% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1974 | 24–17 | 58.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1975 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1976 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | 1968 | 41–10 | 80.4% | — | 1,864 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–4 | 66.7% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 9 | 1969 | 74–15 | 83.1% | — | 2,044 | 1 | 9 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1970 | 75–16 | 82.4% | — | 2,104 | 1 | 18 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1971 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 2,166 | 1 | 20 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1974 | 6–0 | 100.0% | — | 2,173 | 1 | 22 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1975 | 8–1 | 88.9% | — | 2,157 | 1 | 25 |
| 38 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 2,106 | 1 | 28 |
| 39 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 7–3 | 70.0% | — | 2,026 | 1 | 28 |
| 40 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 3–1 | 75.0% | — | 2,001 | 1 | 28 |
| 41 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,970 | 1 | 28 |
| 42 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,940 | 1 | 28 |
| 43 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,910 | 1 | 28 |
| 44 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,881 | 1 | 28 |