H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Karen Krantzcke vs Wendy Overton H2H: 2-3
Wendy Overton holds a 3–2 lead over Karen Krantzcke in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Wendy Overton leads 2–1 on carpet and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Wendy Overton won the 1974 Tokyo Sillook round-robin match 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 21, 1974 | Tokyo Sillook | WTA 250 | RR | Carpet | Wendy Overton | 6-2 6-0 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1974* | Chicago | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Karen Krantzcke | 6-4 1-6 6-3 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1973* | Denver | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Karen Krantzcke | 6-2 6-3 | Wendy Overton | Match data |
| Mar 3, 1972* | Rochester | WTA 250 | R16 | Carpet | Wendy Overton | 6-4 6-3 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
| Aug 14, 1969* | Haverford | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Wendy Overton | 2-6 6-4 8-6 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Krantzcke | — | — | — | 1,999 | 276 | 174 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Wendy Overton | — | — | — | 1,920 | 123 | 142 | 46.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Krantzcke | Wendy Overton | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 50–17 | 74.6% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 2–1 | 66.7% | — | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1969 | 66–29 | 69.5% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 8 | 1969 | 7–4 | 63.6% | — | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1970 | 46–24 | 65.7% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 8 | 1970 | 6–11 | 35.3% | — | 1,603 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1971 | 3–15 | 16.7% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 40–30 | 57.1% | — | 1,897 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1973 | 33–31 | 51.6% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 14–23 | 37.8% | — | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1974 | 24–17 | 58.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 12–18 | 40.0% | — | 1,775 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1975 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 17–14 | 54.8% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1976 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 10–17 | 37.0% | — | 1,755 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–4 | 66.7% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 5–11 | 31.2% | — | 1,715 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,650 | 0 | 0 |