H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karen Krantzcke vs Winnie Shaw H2H: 3-2
Karen Krantzcke holds a 3–2 lead over Winnie Shaw in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Karen Krantzcke leads 2–1 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Karen Krantzcke won the 1974 Wimbledon third round 6-2 9-7.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 1974* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Karen Krantzcke | 6-2 9-7 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| May 1, 1970* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Karen Krantzcke | 6-1 6-4 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Feb 2, 1970* | Auckland | WTA 250 | QF | Grass | Karen Krantzcke | 0-6 6-4 6-3 | Winnie Shaw | Match data |
| Dec 9, 1969* | Brisbane | WTA 500 | F | Grass | Winnie Shaw | 11-9 6-3 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
| May 3, 1969* | Bournemouth | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Winnie Shaw | 6-3 8-6 | Karen Krantzcke | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karen Krantzcke | — | — | — | 1,999 | 276 | 174 | 61.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 7 | 9 |
| Winnie Shaw | — | — | — | 1,991 | 296 | 144 | 67.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 12 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karen Krantzcke | Winnie Shaw | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 21 | 1968 | 50–17 | 74.6% | — | 1,793 | 0 | 4 | 1968 | 49–28 | 63.6% | — | 1,787 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 1969 | 66–29 | 69.5% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 8 | 1969 | 69–27 | 71.9% | — | 1,907 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 1970 | 46–24 | 65.7% | — | 1,861 | 0 | 8 | 1970 | 55–26 | 67.9% | — | 1,941 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1971 | 3–15 | 16.7% | — | 1,760 | 0 | 8 | 1971 | 46–26 | 63.9% | — | 1,855 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 1972 | 35–27 | 56.5% | — | 1,939 | 0 | 8 | 1972 | 32–12 | 72.7% | — | 1,858 | 0 | 11 |
| 26 | 1973 | 33–31 | 51.6% | — | 1,893 | 0 | 8 | 1973 | 2–2 | 50.0% | — | 1,828 | 0 | 12 |
| 27 | 1974 | 24–17 | 58.5% | — | 1,910 | 0 | 9 | 1974 | 5–3 | 62.5% | — | 1,821 | 0 | 12 |
| 28 | 1975 | 5–7 | 41.7% | — | 1,837 | 0 | 9 | 1975 | 10–6 | 62.5% | — | 1,795 | 0 | 12 |
| 29 | 1976 | 6–3 | 66.7% | — | 1,833 | 0 | 9 | 1976 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,735 | 0 | 12 |
| 30 | 1977 | 8–4 | 66.7% | — | 1,801 | 0 | 9 | 1977 | 8–2 | 80.0% | — | 1,796 | 0 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1978 | 12–5 | 70.6% | — | 1,784 | 0 | 14 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1979 | 4–2 | 66.7% | — | 1,761 | 0 | 14 |