Karin Knapp
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberta Vinci | 4 | 3 | 7 | Aug 12, 2015 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 5, 2015 | H2H |
| Johanna Larsson | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 31, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 8, 2016 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 23, 2016 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC
Marion Bartoli holds a 2–0 lead over Karin Knapp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Marion Bartoli leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Marion Bartoli won the 2013 Wimbledon round of 16 6-2 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marion Bartoli | 6-2 6-3 | Karin Knapp | Match data | Jul 3, 2013* | R16 | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | Grass |
| Marion Bartoli | 6-1 6-0 | Karin Knapp | Match data | Jan 10, 2008* | R32 | Sydney International | Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 | Hard |
Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,710 | 103 | 118 | 46.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Marion Bartoli | #13 | #7 | 5,160 | 1,993 | 402 | 267 | 60.1% | 1 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 8 |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #307 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,511 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #58 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 26–23 | 53.1% | #41 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 26–25 | 51.0% | #37 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,603 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 45–28 | 61.6% | #18 | 1,801 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,555 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 47–31 | 60.3% | #10 | 1,875 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #17 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 46–22 | 67.6% | #11 | 1,884 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #16 | 1,815 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 60–26 | 69.8% | #9 | 1,926 | 0 | 7 |
| 27 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,644 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #11 | 1,819 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,704 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 23–15 | 60.5% | #13 | 1,802 | 1 | 8 |
| 29 | 2016 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #147 | 1,637 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,617 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13 | 11 | 24 | 54.2% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% |
| 19 | 2006 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 21 | 15 | 36 | 58.3% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 11 | 7 | 18 | 61.1% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 21 | 20 | 41 | 51.2% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 21 | 2008 | 7 | 8 | 15 | 46.7% | 4 | 5 | 9 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2006 | 37 | 17 | 54 | 68.5% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% |
| 22 | 2009 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 42.9% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 21 | 20 | 41 | 51.2% | 14 | 7 | 21 | 66.7% | 12 | 3 | 15 | 80.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 21 | 16 | 37 | 56.8% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | 2 | 1 | 3 | 66.7% |
| 24 | 2011 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 34 | 14 | 48 | 70.8% | 7 | 6 | 13 | 53.8% | 5 | 2 | 7 | 71.4% | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2012 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | 6 | 4 | 10 | 60.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 27 | 14 | 41 | 65.9% | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | 6 | 2 | 8 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2013 | 6 | 6 | 12 | 50.0% | 11 | 8 | 19 | 57.9% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 39 | 18 | 57 | 68.4% | 12 | 7 | 19 | 63.2% | 9 | 1 | 10 | 90.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 13 | 15 | 28 | 46.4% | 4 | 7 | 11 | 36.4% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | 2012 | 31 | 16 | 47 | 66.0% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 4 | 2 | 6 | 66.7% | 3 | 1 | 4 | 75.0% |
| 28 | 2015 | 10 | 13 | 23 | 43.5% | 12 | 4 | 16 | 75.0% | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 10 | 9 | 19 | 52.6% | 4 | 4 | 8 | 50.0% | 8 | 1 | 9 | 88.9% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% |
| 29 | 2016 | 0 | 4 | 4 | 0.0% | 5 | 5 | 10 | 50.0% | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 44 | 62 | 106 | 41.5% | 55 | 45 | 100 | 55.0% | 3 | 9 | 12 | 25.0% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | 277 | 172 | 449 | 61.7% | 56 | 61 | 117 | 47.9% | 58 | 25 | 83 | 69.9% | 11 | 9 | 20 | 55.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 191/221 of Karin Knapp's and 460/663 of Marion Bartoli's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 18 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4/41 | 2.0 | 3.5 | 61.8% | 57.6% | 36.8% | 60.4% | 56.3% | 49.9% | 41.0% |
| 19 | 2006 | 2/7 | 2.5 | 4.5 | 56.9% | 69.2% | 46.9% | 37.5% | 67.9% | 60.1% | 43.1% | 2004 | 5/49 | 1.4 | 3.6 | 64.9% | 56.3% | 43.5% | 64.9% | 57.5% | 51.9% | 47.3% |
| 20 | 2007 | 19/28 | 3.0 | 6.3 | 54.6% | 65.6% | 42.6% | 50.6% | 36.5% | 55.0% | 44.6% | 2005 | 9/51 | 0.8 | 1.3 | 69.1% | 57.1% | 43.5% | 51.2% | 51.4% | 52.7% | 48.9% |
| 21 | 2008 | 21/25 | 2.1 | 5.0 | 60.9% | 60.3% | 40.5% | 48.7% | 51.3% | 52.6% | 43.1% | 2006 | 38/73 | 1.4 | 2.5 | 68.5% | 60.5% | 45.0% | 53.5% | 47.4% | 55.7% | 45.6% |
| 22 | 2009 | 8/9 | 0.8 | 5.3 | 50.2% | 59.7% | 41.0% | 49.3% | 44.6% | 49.7% | 43.9% | 2007 | 70/78 | 1.7 | 3.1 | 66.7% | 63.9% | 44.6% | 52.7% | 50.5% | 57.5% | 46.4% |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 54/56 | 2.0 | 4.3 | 62.5% | 64.0% | 44.4% | 47.8% | 46.1% | 56.5% | 45.5% |
| 24 | 2011 | 3/3 | 1.0 | 10.7 | 59.1% | 60.2% | 39.8% | 51.3% | 49.7% | 51.6% | 41.5% | 2009 | 61/68 | 2.2 | 4.3 | 61.0% | 65.9% | 45.5% | 45.9% | 51.9% | 58.1% | 48.7% |
| 25 | 2012 | 14/14 | 1.6 | 6.0 | 59.3% | 60.0% | 40.5% | 49.9% | 43.5% | 52.0% | 44.1% | 2010 | 51/57 | 3.3 | 4.7 | 59.7% | 70.0% | 47.7% | 48.2% | 50.8% | 60.8% | 45.5% |
| 26 | 2013 | 29/35 | 2.9 | 5.0 | 56.6% | 67.7% | 43.8% | 54.9% | 50.9% | 57.4% | 46.7% | 2011 | 73/86 | 3.1 | 4.5 | 59.0% | 68.8% | 47.3% | 56.8% | 53.1% | 59.8% | 49.3% |
| 27 | 2014 | 39/42 | 3.6 | 4.7 | 57.7% | 65.5% | 43.2% | 50.6% | 51.2% | 55.9% | 41.9% | 2012 | 63/66 | 2.7 | 6.7 | 57.6% | 66.8% | 43.6% | 52.6% | 52.1% | 56.9% | 46.9% |
| 28 | 2015 | 41/42 | 2.5 | 4.2 | 64.1% | 61.4% | 48.0% | 52.5% | 49.5% | 56.7% | 43.8% | 2013 | 32/38 | 2.3 | 7.6 | 58.5% | 66.7% | 44.0% | 55.3% | 53.1% | 57.5% | 46.8% |
| 29 | 2016 | 14/15 | 2.7 | 4.9 | 56.1% | 61.7% | 41.1% | 46.8% | 45.0% | 52.8% | 40.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 5.0 | 48.1% | 60.0% | 29.6% | 58.3% | 50.0% | 44.2% | 44.7% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 191/221 | 2.6 | 5.1 | 58.6% | 63.4% | 43.5% | 51.0% | 48.2% | 55.0% | 43.6% | — | 460/669 | 2.4 | 4.5 | 61.8% | 65.6% | 45.2% | 51.8% | 50.9% | 57.7% | 47.0% |
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Marion Bartoli | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1484 | 97.3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 0.0% | -2.50 | — | — | — | +0.20 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1512 | 120.3 | — | — | — | — | +49 | — | — | 46.2% | -0.08 | 1–2 (33%) | — | — | -0.04 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1637 | 133.4 | -0.70 | +0.08 | 0.819 | 46.0% | +31 | -124 | -53 | 48.3% | -0.21 | 6–7 (46%) | 8–1 (89%) | 105.6 | -0.73 |
| 19 | 2006 | 1513 | 108.6 | -0.12 | -2.10 | 1.081 | 52.1% | -5 | +47 | — | 47.1% | +0.47 | 1–2 (33%) | 2–4 (33%) | 98.3 | +0.25 | 2004 | 1674 | 131.9 | -1.04 | +1.09 | 0.984 | 50.1% | +23 | -166 | -97 | 58.8% | +0.71 | 2–5 (29%) | 3–4 (43%) | 95.2 | +0.44 |
| 20 | 2007 | 1587 | 121.4 | -0.55 | -0.12 | 0.990 | 49.7% | -69 | +90 | — | 49.3% | 0.00 | 6–7 (46%) | 6–3 (67%) | 101.3 | +0.69 | 2005 | 1632 | 133.1 | -1.32 | +1.68 | 1.034 | 50.8% | +17 | — | -23 | 55.0% | +0.78 | 5–7 (42%) | 2–7 (22%) | 94.0 | +1.61 |
| 21 | 2008 | 1603 | 120.0 | -1.76 | -0.63 | 0.909 | 48.0% | -25 | +27 | — | 46.6% | -0.74 | 3–5 (38%) | 5–3 (63%) | 99.5 | +1.04 | 2006 | 1801 | 139.5 | -0.51 | +0.92 | 1.028 | 50.7% | +32 | -303 | -174 | 60.1% | +0.86 | 11–9 (55%) | 5–4 (56%) | 100.0 | +3.77 |
| 22 | 2009 | 1556 | 96.3 | -3.79 | -1.88 | 0.874 | 46.7% | +5 | — | — | 25.0% | -1.75 | — | 1–1 | — | +1.05 | 2007 | 1875 | 142.0 | +2.12 | +2.52 | 1.092 | 51.8% | -79 | -152 | +82 | 59.0% | +0.72 | 12–8 (60%) | 4–6 (40%) | 102.9 | +1.20 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1807 | 142.6 | +1.65 | +1.46 | 1.045 | 50.9% | +6 | -164 | +85 | 56.1% | +0.28 | 8–11 (42%) | 9–3 (75%) | 99.2 | +2.91 |
| 24 | 2011 | 1531 | 107.5 | +1.01 | -0.38 | 0.858 | 47.0% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.11 | 0–3 (0%) | 2–1 (67%) | — | -0.47 | 2009 | 1885 | 150.4 | +2.39 | +4.50 | 1.163 | 53.2% | +28 | -227 | -2 | 67.1% | +1.29 | 14–4 (78%) | 6–3 (67%) | 110.3 | +1.28 |
| 25 | 2012 | 1562 | 108.4 | -2.46 | -0.27 | 0.918 | 48.2% | -36 | +93 | — | 45.7% | -0.69 | 5–2 (71%) | 1–1 | — | +0.13 | 2010 | 1815 | 147.0 | +4.48 | +1.93 | 1.161 | 53.0% | +45 | -192 | +84 | 63.8% | +0.97 | 4–6 (40%) | 4–4 (50%) | 95.4 | +2.32 |
| 26 | 2013 | 1681 | 127.7 | +1.14 | +1.48 | 1.097 | 52.0% | -86 | -9 | -89 | 57.3% | +0.40 | 5–7 (42%) | 5–1 (83%) | 103.3 | +0.66 | 2011 | 1927 | 155.9 | +4.15 | +5.80 | 1.227 | 54.4% | -14 | -156 | +107 | 65.1% | +1.25 | 15–6 (71%) | 7–2 (78%) | 108.8 | -1.14 |
| 27 | 2014 | 1645 | 120.9 | -0.61 | -1.24 | 0.951 | 49.0% | -13 | -18 | — | 45.7% | -0.48 | 4–8 (33%) | 6–5 (55%) | 97.7 | +0.92 | 2012 | 1820 | 145.9 | +1.09 | +3.31 | 1.088 | 51.8% | +54 | -143 | +153 | 60.5% | +0.76 | 12–7 (63%) | 6–2 (75%) | 102.8 | +4.07 |
| 28 | 2015 | 1704 | 130.8 | -0.82 | +1.99 | 1.010 | 50.4% | -81 | +81 | -160 | 53.8% | +0.27 | 6–5 (55%) | 7–7 (50%) | 102.7 | -0.73 | 2013 | 1803 | 132.3 | +1.80 | +2.75 | 1.100 | 52.3% | -34 | -141 | +327 | 63.5% | +0.66 | 3–5 (38%) | 4–1 (80%) | 98.6 | +1.37 |
| 29 | 2016 | 1637 | 105.2 | -1.99 | -0.46 | 0.862 | 46.9% | -62 | +121 | — | 36.4% | -1.42 | 1–4 (20%) | 2–0 | — | -0.47 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 1618 | — | -0.56 | -4.07 | 0.802 | 44.4% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | +0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1711 | 124.9 | -0.85 | +0.14 | 0.969 | 49.4% | -43 | +53 | -119 | 48.2% | -0.26 | 31–43 (42%) | 37–26 (59%) | 103.3 | +1.45 | — | 1993 | 148.0 | +2.18 | +3.05 | 1.112 | 52.3% | +12 | -176 | +67 | 60.1% | +0.77 | 93–77 (55%) | 58–37 (61%) | 105.9 | +2.62 |
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roberta Vinci | 4 | 3 | 7 | Aug 12, 2015 | H2H |
| Caroline Garcia | 2 | 2 | 4 | Mar 5, 2015 | H2H |
| Johanna Larsson | 2 | 1 | 3 | Aug 31, 2016 | H2H |
| Lucie Safarova | 1 | 2 | 3 | Aug 8, 2016 | H2H |
| Julia Goerges | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jul 23, 2016 | H2H |
| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Victoria Azarenka | 3 | 9 | 12 | Oct 6, 2012 | H2H |
| Shuai Peng | 6 | 5 | 11 | May 2, 2013 | H2H |
| Anabel Medina Garrigues | 8 | 3 | 11 | Jan 16, 2013 | H2H |
| Vera Zvonareva | 2 | 9 | 11 | Mar 25, 2011 | H2H |
| Shahar Peer | 3 | 7 | 10 | Feb 25, 2011 | H2H |