H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karin Knapp vs Martina Müller H2H: 1-2
Martina Müller holds a 2–1 lead over Karin Knapp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Martina Müller leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karin Knapp won the 2008 Roland Garros first round 6-0 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2008* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Karin Knapp | 6-0 6-4 | Martina Müller | Match data |
| Jul 21, 2007* | Palermo | WTA 250 | SF | Clay | Martina Müller | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Karin Knapp | Match data |
| Sep 21, 2006* | Portoroz | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Martina Müller | 6-7(6) 6-3 7-6(6) | Karin Knapp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,712 | 103 | 117 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Martina Müller | #808 | #33 | 702 | 1,647 | 62 | 107 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Martina Müller | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #434 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #104 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #69 | 1,581 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #336 | 1,460 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #189 | 1,422 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #111 | 1,461 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #34 | 1,588 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 16–28 | 36.4% | #53 | 1,529 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #183 | 1,441 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #147 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |