H2H data updated: 2026-09-23 00:00 UTC

Karin Knapp vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 1-0

Karin Knapp holds a 1–0 lead over Tamira Paszek in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karin Knapp leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karin Knapp won the 2015 Bad Gastein round of 32 6-0 6-7(5) 7-6(6).

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karin Knapp
Italy Age 39 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Tamira Paszek
Austria Age 35 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karin Knapp #43 6-0 6-7(5) 7-6(6) Tamira Paszek Match data Jul 23, 2015* R32 Bad Gastein International → modern equivalent WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karin Knapp #971 #33 1,420 1,710 103 118 46.6% 0 0 0 0 2 2
Tamira Paszek #441 #366 169 1,782 100 130 43.5% 0 0 0 1 2 3

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karin Knapp Tamira Paszek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% — 1,512 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 2006 6–2 75.0% — 1,599 0 1
16 — — — — — — — 2007 15–14 51.7% — 1,730 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 2008 16–18 47.1% — 1,697 0 1
18 — — — — — — — 2009 5–9 35.7% — 1,626 0 1
19 2006 3–4 42.9% #122 1,513 0 0 2010 9–9 50.0% — 1,642 0 2
20 2007 14–14 50.0% #50 1,587 0 0 2011 19–21 47.5% — 1,654 0 2
21 2008 11–14 44.0% #80 1,603 0 0 2012 18–21 46.2% — 1,676 0 3
22 2009 3–6 33.3% #205 1,555 0 0 2013 2–17 10.5% — 1,476 0 3
23 — — — — — — — 2014 1–4 20.0% — 1,469 0 3
24 2011 0–3 0.0% #164 1,530 0 0 2015 1–4 20.0% — 1,442 0 3
25 2012 7–7 50.0% #120 1,561 0 0 2016 7–10 41.2% — 1,530 0 3
26 2013 20–15 57.1% #41 1,680 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 2014 18–24 42.9% #54 1,644 0 1 — — — — — — —
28 2015 22–20 52.4% #51 1,704 0 2 — — — — — — —
29 2016 5–10 33.3% #147 1,637 0 2 — — — — — — —
30 2017 0–1 0.0% #966 1,617 0 2 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karin Knapp Tamira Paszek
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 5 1 6 83.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 8 16 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 16 13 29 55.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
19 2006 1 2 3 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2010 9 6 15 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
20 2007 3 5 8 37.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2011 12 13 25 48.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
21 2008 7 8 15 46.7% 4 5 9 44.4% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 8 14 22 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 9 3 12 75.0% — — — —
22 2009 3 4 7 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2013 2 9 11 18.2% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2011 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2015 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 2012 1 2 3 33.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 4 6 10 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — —
26 2013 6 6 12 50.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 13 15 28 46.4% 4 7 11 36.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 10 13 23 43.5% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 0 4 4 0.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 44 62 106 41.5% 55 45 100 55.0% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 68 79 147 46.3% 9 29 38 23.7% 23 20 43 53.5% 0 2 2 0.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 191/221 of Karin Knapp's and 206/229 of Tamira Paszek's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karin Knapp Tamira Paszek
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
15 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 1/8 0.0 2.0 96.0% 47.2% 0.0% 36.4% 41.7% 45.3% 46.2%
16 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 28/29 0.6 3.3 67.8% 58.4% 39.6% 46.1% 52.3% 52.7% 43.2%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 34/34 0.5 4.5 63.8% 56.6% 41.0% 47.4% 50.0% 50.9% 44.7%
18 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 13/14 1.4 6.1 62.6% 58.8% 40.1% 46.8% 44.9% 52.1% 44.4%
19 2006 2/7 2.5 4.5 56.9% 69.2% 46.9% 37.5% 67.9% 60.1% 43.1% 2010 16/18 1.4 4.7 60.8% 64.2% 47.1% 48.2% 50.7% 57.5% 46.6%
20 2007 19/28 3.0 6.3 54.6% 65.6% 42.6% 50.6% 36.5% 55.0% 44.6% 2011 38/40 2.1 3.9 59.3% 60.4% 46.4% 46.4% 55.5% 54.5% 42.5%
21 2008 21/25 2.1 5.0 60.9% 60.3% 40.5% 48.7% 51.3% 52.6% 43.1% 2012 38/39 2.0 3.7 60.6% 59.3% 44.2% 56.2% 49.2% 53.5% 43.1%
22 2009 8/9 0.8 5.3 50.2% 59.7% 41.0% 49.3% 44.6% 49.7% 43.9% 2013 16/19 1.0 4.4 62.8% 54.4% 37.2% 49.7% 33.5% 48.1% 37.2%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2014 5/5 1.8 4.6 62.3% 60.1% 48.7% 45.5% 54.6% 55.5% 39.3%
24 2011 3/3 1.0 10.7 59.1% 60.2% 39.8% 51.3% 49.7% 51.6% 41.5% 2015 2/5 0.5 6.5 58.8% 57.8% 48.6% 41.3% 16.7% 53.9% 30.4%
25 2012 14/14 1.6 6.0 59.3% 60.0% 40.5% 49.9% 43.5% 52.0% 44.1% 2016 15/18 1.9 3.4 65.1% 56.6% 36.7% 43.8% 48.3% 49.8% 44.4%
26 2013 29/35 2.9 5.0 56.6% 67.7% 43.8% 54.9% 50.9% 57.4% 46.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 39/42 3.6 4.7 57.7% 65.5% 43.2% 50.6% 51.2% 55.9% 41.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 41/42 2.5 4.2 64.1% 61.4% 48.0% 52.5% 49.5% 56.7% 43.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 14/15 2.7 4.9 56.1% 61.7% 41.1% 46.8% 45.0% 52.8% 40.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1/1 3.0 5.0 48.1% 60.0% 29.6% 58.3% 50.0% 44.2% 44.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 191/221 2.6 5.1 58.6% 63.4% 43.5% 51.0% 48.2% 55.0% 43.6% — 206/231 1.4 4.1 62.7% 58.6% 42.3% 48.4% 49.2% 52.7% 43.1%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karin Knapp Tamira Paszek
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1512 102.6 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.21
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1599 117.1 -2.20 -1.38 0.844 45.8% +6 — — 66.7% +1.17 2–2 (50%) — — +0.29
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1730 133.4 -1.27 +0.75 0.913 47.9% -48 -179 +7 50.7% -0.37 5–4 (56%) 4–2 (67%) 104.0 -1.44
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1697 129.0 -3.26 +1.42 0.909 47.8% +12 -213 — 47.4% -0.25 8–4 (67%) 3–0 (100%) 108.1 -1.57
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1626 108.4 -2.23 +0.93 0.929 48.2% +26 -113 — 43.8% -0.53 2–4 (33%) 0–2 — -0.05
19 2006 1513 108.6 -0.12 -2.10 1.081 52.1% -5 +47 — 47.1% +0.47 1–2 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 98.3 +0.25 2010 1643 118.8 -0.31 +0.77 1.096 52.0% +37 — — 52.4% +0.21 2–4 (33%) 2–4 (33%) 97.8 +1.13
20 2007 1587 121.4 -0.55 -0.12 0.990 49.7% -69 +90 — 49.3% 0.00 6–7 (46%) 6–3 (67%) 101.3 +0.69 2011 1654 118.4 -0.83 -1.22 0.934 48.7% -29 -208 +84 44.9% -0.32 11–4 (73%) 5–5 (50%) 105.7 +0.40
21 2008 1603 120.0 -1.76 -0.63 0.909 48.0% -25 +27 — 46.6% -0.74 3–5 (38%) 5–3 (63%) 99.5 +1.04 2012 1676 126.3 -1.34 -0.35 0.926 48.5% -91 -243 +189 45.0% -0.36 8–2 (80%) 5–7 (42%) 105.1 -1.21
22 2009 1556 96.3 -3.79 -1.88 0.874 46.7% +5 — — 25.0% -1.75 — 1–1 — +1.05 2013 1476 92.5 -4.43 -3.94 0.718 42.8% +20 -113 +289 13.9% -2.69 1–3 (25%) 1–2 (33%) 96.6 +1.10
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1469 105.3 -0.61 -1.02 0.882 47.8% — — — 38.5% -1.00 0–3 (0%) 2–0 — -0.22
24 2011 1531 107.5 +1.01 -0.38 0.858 47.0% — — — 33.3% -1.11 0–3 (0%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.47 2015 1442 101.2 -2.43 -3.45 0.659 42.2% +34 — — 27.3% -1.27 0–1 1–1 — +0.30
25 2012 1562 108.4 -2.46 -0.27 0.918 48.2% -36 +93 — 45.7% -0.69 5–2 (71%) 1–1 — +0.13 2016 1531 112.6 -3.82 +0.69 0.885 47.2% -40 — +186 38.2% -0.88 3–1 (75%) 1–1 — -0.03
26 2013 1681 127.7 +1.14 +1.48 1.097 52.0% -86 -9 -89 57.3% +0.40 5–7 (42%) 5–1 (83%) 103.3 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 2014 1645 120.9 -0.61 -1.24 0.951 49.0% -13 -18 — 45.7% -0.48 4–8 (33%) 6–5 (55%) 97.7 +0.92 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2015 1704 130.8 -0.82 +1.99 1.010 50.4% -81 +81 -160 53.8% +0.27 6–5 (55%) 7–7 (50%) 102.7 -0.73 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2016 1637 105.2 -1.99 -0.46 0.862 46.9% -62 +121 — 36.4% -1.42 1–4 (20%) 2–0 — -0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2017 1618 — -0.56 -4.07 0.802 44.4% — — — — — — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1510 — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1711 124.9 -0.85 +0.14 0.969 49.4% -43 +53 -119 48.2% -0.26 31–43 (42%) 37–26 (59%) 103.3 +1.45 — 1783 124.5 -1.95 -0.16 0.910 48.0% -16 -177 +137 44.1% -0.50 43–32 (57%) 25–24 (51%) 108.2 -0.48

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.