H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 04:30 UTC
Karin Knapp vs Yanina Wickmayer H2H: 0-3
Yanina Wickmayer holds a 3–0 lead over Karin Knapp in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Yanina Wickmayer leads 2–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Yanina Wickmayer won the 2016 Miami first round 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 39
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
BEL
Age 36
Right-Handed
182 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2016* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-2 6-1 | Karin Knapp | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2015* | Nottingham | WTA 250 | R32 | Grass | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-4 6-2 | Karin Knapp | Match data |
| Mar 10, 2015* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Yanina Wickmayer | 6-1 7-5 | Karin Knapp | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Knapp | #971 | #33 | 1,420 | 1,712 | 103 | 117 | 46.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Yanina Wickmayer | #765 | #12 | 3,320 | 1,932 | 218 | 217 | 50.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Knapp | Yanina Wickmayer | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #73 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2006 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 32–16 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,843 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2007 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 31–21 | 59.6% | #23 | 1,769 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 2008 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #80 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #26 | 1,771 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2009 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #205 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #23 | 1,614 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #51 | 1,588 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2011 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #75 | 1,556 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2012 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #41 | 1,684 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 2013 | 20–15 | 57.1% | #41 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 | 2016 | 14–23 | 37.8% | #58 | 1,574 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2014 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #54 | 1,646 | 0 | 1 | 2017 | 11–14 | 44.0% | #115 | 1,624 | 0 | 5 |
| 28 | 2015 | 22–20 | 52.4% | #51 | 1,705 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #122 | 1,637 | 0 | 5 |
| 29 | 2016 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #147 | 1,648 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #152 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | 2017 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #966 | 1,628 | 0 | 2 | 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #166 | 1,565 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #321 | 1,554 | 0 | 5 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #71 | 1,651 | 0 | 5 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,530 | 0 | 5 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #765 | 1,500 | 0 | 5 |