H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karin Kschwendt vs Ann Grossman H2H: 2-1
Karin Kschwendt holds a 2–1 lead over Ann Grossman in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karin Kschwendt leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Ann Grossman won the 1997 Key Biscayne first round 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 55
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 21, 1997* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Ann Grossman | 6-3 6-1 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
| Aug 22, 1991* | Schenectady | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Karin Kschwendt | 7-6 6-4 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1991* | Boca Raton | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Karin Kschwendt | 6-3 7-5 | Ann Grossman | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Kschwendt | #507 | #37 | 426 | 1,712 | 79 | 116 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ann Grossman | #343 | #29 | 384 | 1,888 | 187 | 185 | 50.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Kschwendt | Ann Grossman | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #378 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #48 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #54 | 1,736 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 23–22 | 51.1% | #50 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #89 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #36 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #88 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #35 | 1,810 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #37 | 1,853 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #72 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #85 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #75 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #283 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #172 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |