H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Karin Kschwendt vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-2

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 2–0 lead over Karin Kschwendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1995 Eastbourne Open round of 32 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karin Kschwendt
AUT Age 57 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #16 6-4 6-4 Karin Kschwendt #126 Match data Jun 22, 1995* R32 Eastbourne Open Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Grass
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 6-3 6-2 Karin Kschwendt #93 Match data Jan 18, 1995* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karin Kschwendt #507 #37 426 1,712 79 116 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 298 222 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karin Kschwendt Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,675 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,599 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,676 0 0
20 1989 3–9 25.0% #178 1,476 0 0 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1990 6–9 40.0% #116 1,499 0 0 1992 31–21 59.6% #33 1,822 0 2
22 1991 15–18 45.5% #88 1,569 0 0 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,791 0 3
23 1992 4–7 36.4% #77 1,574 0 0 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,886 0 3
24 1993 15–16 48.4% #81 1,598 0 0 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,971 0 5
25 1994 9–15 37.5% #99 1,610 0 0 1996 37–19 66.1% #12 1,910 0 6
26 1995 10–13 43.5% #85 1,605 0 0 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,856 0 7
27 1996 15–14 51.7% #53 1,658 0 0 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,674 0 7
28 1997 1–12 7.7% #172 1,536 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,652 0 7
29 1998 1–2 33.3% #139 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2000 0–1 0.0% #413 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karin Kschwendt Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 2 3 5 40.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 8 7 15 53.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 6 4 10 60.0%
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 10 7 17 58.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0%
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 9 8 17 52.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0%
20 1989 0 3 3 0.0% 3 5 8 37.5% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 9 8 17 52.9% 3 3 6 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 3 5 8 37.5%
21 1990 1 2 3 33.3% 2 4 6 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% 1 2 3 33.3% 1992 11 8 19 57.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 5 6 16.7%
22 1991 12 10 22 54.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1993 6 8 14 42.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 4 6 33.3%
23 1992 0 2 2 0.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1994 13 6 19 68.4% 18 7 25 72.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 5 14 64.3%
24 1993 9 7 16 56.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 20 6 26 76.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 2 7 71.4% 10 4 14 71.4%
25 1994 5 10 15 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 18 8 26 69.2% 5 3 8 62.5% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 5 13 61.5%
26 1995 5 7 12 41.7% 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 1997 6 9 15 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 5 2 7 71.4% 12 7 19 63.2%
27 1996 10 6 16 62.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1998 2 5 7 28.6% 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
28 1997 1 7 8 12.5% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 1998 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 43 55 98 43.9% 26 40 66 39.4% 4 8 12 33.3% 6 13 19 31.6% — 115 88 203 56.7% 79 57 136 58.1% 48 28 76 63.2% 56 49 105 53.3%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karin Kschwendt Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1491 102.0 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.09
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1516 114.3 — — — — +14 +66 — 44.4% +0.59 3–2 (60%) 0–4 (0%) 99.6 +0.98
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1676 132.1 — — — — -3 -46 -109 50.0% -0.12 7–5 (58%) 9–5 (64%) 105.0 +1.87
18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 1600 127.5 — — — — +72 -49 -48 42.7% -0.39 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 96.4 +0.98
19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1990 1676 128.3 — — — — +2 -134 -49 51.9% -0.08 4–5 (44%) 5–8 (38%) 95.5 +0.09
20 1989 1477 108.7 — — — — +1 +93 — 28.6% -1.21 2–2 (50%) 1–4 (20%) 99.0 +0.60 1991 1799 143.8 — — — — -69 -241 +12 54.0% +0.18 8–6 (57%) 10–4 (71%) 109.5 -1.70
21 1990 1500 116.8 — — — — -22 +27 +132 41.7% -0.22 3–3 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 100.3 +1.10 1992 1823 148.5 — — — — -54 -53 +64 55.6% +0.34 14–10 (58%) 9–7 (56%) 105.5 -0.55
22 1991 1570 131.4 — — — — -8 -8 — 49.3% -0.11 4–7 (36%) 6–2 (75%) 100.2 -0.70 1993 1792 145.4 — — — — -104 +99 +125 57.4% +0.44 5–6 (45%) 5–2 (71%) 101.4 -1.23
23 1992 1575 122.9 — — — — — +34 — 41.7% -0.58 0–2 0–2 — +0.11 1994 1886 147.7 — — — — -40 +53 -14 62.7% +0.70 11–3 (79%) 11–7 (61%) 112.3 +0.33
24 1993 1599 127.8 — — — — +18 -14 — 52.8% +0.60 4–8 (33%) 1–2 (33%) 95.7 +1.30 1995 1971 149.3 — — — — +20 -90 -60 64.5% +0.82 15–4 (79%) 13–12 (52%) 104.4 +1.45
25 1994 1611 123.8 — — — — -13 +13 — 39.3% -1.07 4–4 (50%) 1–1 — -0.22 1996 1911 151.8 — — — — +44 -26 +47 60.6% +0.51 14–6 (70%) 13–12 (52%) 99.9 +1.96
26 1995 1606 119.9 — — — — -36 +45 -50 41.7% -0.38 2–4 (33%) 1–2 (33%) — -0.29 1997 1856 146.3 — — — — -5 +2 +142 57.7% +0.51 11–9 (55%) 11–5 (69%) 100.3 -0.20
27 1996 1659 133.2 — — — — +16 -26 -78 47.7% -0.05 6–1 (86%) 2–1 (67%) — -0.27 1998 1675 104.7 — — — — +65 +68 — 39.1% -1.04 0–3 (0%) 3–2 (60%) 96.5 +1.05
28 1997 1536 106.7 — — — — +44 +39 — 17.2% -2.17 0–3 (0%) 0–2 — -0.89 1999 1653 98.3 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18
29 1998 1534 104.9 — — — — — — — 37.5% -0.88 1–1 — — +0.24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2000 1516 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.00 — — — +0.14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1642 101.1 -1.73 -1.74 0.650 43.0% — — +401 36.4% -0.82 1–0 1–1 — -0.10
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1614 101.2 -1.59 -2.16 0.779 45.4% +53 — — 25.0% -1.63 — 0–2 — -0.39
37 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1592 96.8 +1.39 -2.63 0.741 44.9% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 — — +0.16
Career — 1713 130.2 — — — — +1 +22 +1 42.7% -0.41 26–35 (43%) 14–20 (41%) 95.1 +0.57 — 2025 147.4 -1.20 -2.11 0.735 44.6% -6 -3 +29 55.4% +0.29 100–69 (59%) 96–80 (55%) 105.7 +0.96

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.