H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC

Karin Kschwendt vs Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy H2H: 0-2

Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy holds a 2–0 lead over Karin Kschwendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy won the 1995 Eastbourne third round 6-4 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karin Kschwendt
AUT Age 57 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main draw meetings
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
NED Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 22, 1995* Eastbourne WTA 250 R32 Grass Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #16 6-4 6-4 Karin Kschwendt #126 Match data
Jan 18, 1995* Australian Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #14 6-3 6-2 Karin Kschwendt #93 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Karin Kschwendt #507 #37 426 1,712 79 116 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy #919 #9 1,672 2,025 295 220 57.3% 0 0 0 0 7 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karin Kschwendt Brenda Schultz-Mccarthy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1986 0–1 0.0% — 1,490 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1987 5–6 45.5% #149 1,515 0 0
17 — — — — — — — 1988 21–18 53.8% #40 1,689 0 0
18 — — — — — — — 1989 15–22 40.5% #83 1,603 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 18–17 51.4% #43 1,677 0 0
20 1989 3–9 25.0% #178 1,477 0 0 1991 24–19 55.8% #30 1,799 0 1
21 1990 6–9 40.0% #116 1,500 0 0 1992 30–20 60.0% #33 1,818 0 2
22 1991 15–18 45.5% #88 1,570 0 0 1993 26–20 56.5% #40 1,789 0 3
23 1992 4–7 36.4% #77 1,575 0 0 1994 44–21 67.7% #15 1,885 0 3
24 1993 15–16 48.4% #81 1,598 0 0 1995 37–15 71.2% #13 1,970 0 5
25 1994 9–15 37.5% #99 1,610 0 0 1996 35–18 66.0% #12 1,908 0 6
26 1995 10–13 43.5% #85 1,604 0 0 1997 34–25 57.6% #15 1,855 0 7
27 1996 15–14 51.7% #53 1,658 0 0 1998 3–10 23.1% #188 1,673 0 7
28 1997 1–12 7.7% #172 1,536 0 0 1999 0–1 0.0% #893 1,651 0 7
29 1998 1–2 33.3% #139 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2000 0–1 0.0% #413 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 — — — — — — — 2006 2–3 40.0% #299 1,642 0 7
36 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #190 1,614 0 7
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% #391 1,592 0 7