H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karin Kschwendt vs Claudia Porwik H2H: 1-2
Claudia Porwik holds a 2–1 lead over Karin Kschwendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Claudia Porwik leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Claudia Porwik won the 1996 Jakarta fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
GER
Age 57
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 13, 1996* | Jakarta | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Claudia Porwik | 6-2 6-4 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
| Jul 29, 1994* | Stratton Mountain | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Karin Kschwendt | 6-1 7-5 | Claudia Porwik | Match data |
| Oct 3, 1991* | Leipzig | WTA 250 | R32 | Carpet | Claudia Porwik | 6-3 6-1 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Kschwendt | #507 | #37 | 426 | 1,712 | 79 | 116 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Claudia Porwik | #579 | #29 | 148 | 1,788 | 114 | 146 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Kschwendt | Claudia Porwik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 6–5 | 54.5% | #96 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #104 | 1,582 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #68 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #75 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 18–17 | 51.4% | #29 | 1,667 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #88 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #80 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 12–18 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 13–20 | 39.4% | #92 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #256 | 1,583 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #85 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #133 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #153 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #172 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |