H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Karin Kschwendt vs Judith Wiesner H2H: 0-3
Judith Wiesner holds a 3–0 lead over Karin Kschwendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Judith Wiesner leads 2–0 on clay and 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Judith Wiesner won the 1996 Linz fourth round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
3
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 60
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 1, 1996* | Linz | WTA 500 | R16 | Carpet | Judith Wiesner | 7-5 6-2 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
| Jul 28, 1995* | Styria | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 6-3 5-7 6-1 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
| Jul 19, 1991* | Kitzbuhel | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Judith Wiesner | 2-6 6-2 6-4 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Kschwendt | #507 | #37 | 426 | 1,712 | 79 | 116 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Judith Wiesner | #48 | #12 | 1,590 | 1,979 | 302 | 177 | 63.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 4 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Kschwendt | Judith Wiesner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #141 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 19–13 | 59.4% | #33 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #88 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #33 | 1,751 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1992 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #35 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1993 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #17 | 1,845 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #85 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 29–17 | 63.0% | #25 | 1,916 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 30–17 | 63.8% | #21 | 1,906 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1997 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #172 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 28–15 | 65.1% | #25 | 1,893 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #25 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 35–22 | 61.4% | #15 | 1,925 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 17–11 | 60.7% | #48 | 1,829 | 0 | 5 |