H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karin Kschwendt vs Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel H2H: 2-0
Karin Kschwendt holds a 2–0 lead over Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karin Kschwendt leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karin Kschwendt won the 1994 Key Biscayne first round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
Age 59
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 12, 1994* | Key Biscayne | WTA 1000 | R128 | Hard | Karin Kschwendt | 6-3 6-4 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
| Jun 27, 1990* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Karin Kschwendt | 6-3 2-6 6-2 | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Kschwendt | #507 | #37 | 426 | 1,712 | 79 | 116 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | — | — | — | 2,082 | 277 | 213 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Kschwendt | Kathy Rinaldi Stunkel | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 13 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1980 | 4–5 | 44.4% | — | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1981 | 27–14 | 65.9% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 2 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1982 | 30–19 | 61.2% | — | 1,871 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1983 | 29–17 | 63.0% | — | 1,844 | 0 | 2 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 27–19 | 58.7% | — | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 41–16 | 71.9% | — | 1,975 | 0 | 3 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 34–16 | 68.0% | — | 1,974 | 0 | 4 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 15–8 | 65.2% | — | 1,903 | 0 | 4 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 5–8 | 38.5% | — | 1,812 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #88 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 4 |
| 23 | 1992 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 15–18 | 45.5% | — | 1,698 | 0 | 4 |
| 24 | 1993 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–15 | 31.8% | — | 1,590 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 10–15 | 40.0% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #85 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,629 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 1–5 | 16.7% | — | 1,586 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 1997 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #172 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | — | 1,608 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–8 | 27.3% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |