H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karin Kschwendt vs Kimberly Po Messerli H2H: 1-0
Karin Kschwendt holds a 1–0 lead over Kimberly Po Messerli in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karin Kschwendt leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Karin Kschwendt won the 1994 Roland Garros second round 2-6 6-1 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
Age 54
Right-Handed
160 cm / 5'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 1994* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Karin Kschwendt | 2-6 6-1 7-5 | Kimberly Po Messerli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Kschwendt | #507 | #37 | 426 | 1,712 | 79 | 116 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kimberly Po Messerli | — | — | — | 1,878 | 118 | 133 | 47.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Kschwendt | Kimberly Po Messerli | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 5–4 | 55.6% | — | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 14–16 | 46.7% | — | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 20–19 | 51.3% | — | 1,776 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #88 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 11–17 | 39.3% | — | 1,701 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 4–13 | 23.5% | — | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 20–13 | 60.6% | — | 1,806 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 27–20 | 57.4% | — | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #85 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–15 | 42.3% | — | 1,742 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–13 | 31.6% | — | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #172 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | — | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |