H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Karin Kschwendt vs Kimiko Date Krumm H2H: 1-4

Kimiko Date Krumm holds a 4–1 lead over Karin Kschwendt in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Kimiko Date Krumm leads 3–1 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Kimiko Date Krumm won the 1996 Tokyo quarterfinal 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karin Kschwendt
AUT Age 57 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Kimiko Date Krumm
Age 55 Right-Handed 163 cm / 5'4"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 20, 1996* Tokyo WTA 500 QF Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-2 Karin Kschwendt #53 Match data
Mar 13, 1994* Key Biscayne WTA 1000 R64 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-2 6-2 Karin Kschwendt #126 Match data
Sep 24, 1993* Tokyo Nichirei WTA 250 R32 Hard Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 3-6 6-3 Karin Kschwendt #71 Match data
May 26, 1993* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Kimiko Date Krumm 6-4 6-4 Karin Kschwendt #53 Match data
Apr 11, 1991* Tokyo Japan Open WTA 250 R32 Hard Karin Kschwendt #70 7-5 6-4 Kimiko Date Krumm Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Karin Kschwendt #507 #37 426 1,712 79 116 40.5% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Kimiko Date Krumm — — — 2,091 241 188 56.2% 0 1 0 3 4 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karin Kschwendt Kimiko Date Krumm
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 — — — — — — — 1989 6–5 54.5% — 1,562 0 0
19 — — — — — — — 1990 10–7 58.8% — 1,664 0 0
20 1989 3–9 25.0% #178 1,477 0 0 1991 12–11 52.2% — 1,725 0 0
21 1990 6–9 40.0% #116 1,500 0 0 1992 26–13 66.7% — 1,867 0 1
22 1991 15–18 45.5% #88 1,570 0 0 1993 25–11 69.4% — 1,956 0 2
23 1992 4–7 36.4% #77 1,575 0 0 1994 32–12 72.7% — 1,987 0 4
24 1993 15–16 48.4% #81 1,598 0 0 1995 39–12 76.5% — 2,029 0 5
25 1994 9–15 37.5% #99 1,610 0 0 1996 31–13 70.5% — 2,071 0 7
26 1995 10–13 43.5% #85 1,604 0 0 — — — — — — —
27 1996 15–14 51.7% #53 1,658 0 0 — — — — — — —
28 1997 1–12 7.7% #172 1,536 0 0 — — — — — — —
29 1998 1–2 33.3% #139 1,534 0 0 — — — — — — —
31 2000 0–1 0.0% #413 1,516 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 — — — — — — — 2008 0–1 0.0% — 2,042 0 7
38 — — — — — — — 2009 6–11 35.3% — 1,841 0 8
39 — — — — — — — 2010 19–18 51.4% — 1,814 0 8
40 — — — — — — — 2011 7–24 22.6% — 1,567 0 8
41 — — — — — — — 2012 2–14 12.5% — 1,454 0 8
42 — — — — — — — 2013 12–15 44.4% — 1,575 0 8
43 — — — — — — — 2014 11–14 44.0% — 1,597 0 8
44 — — — — — — — 2015 3–6 33.3% — 1,574 0 8
46 — — — — — — — 2017 0–1 0.0% — 1,564 0 8