H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Karin Kschwendt vs Nana Smith H2H: 2-0
Karin Kschwendt holds a 2–0 lead over Nana Smith in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karin Kschwendt leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karin Kschwendt won the 1996 Australian Open second round 2-6 6-2 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
JPN
Age 55
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 19, 1996* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Karin Kschwendt | 2-6 6-2 6-1 | Nana Smith | Match data |
| Apr 19, 1991* | Pattaya | WTA 250 | R16 | Hard | Karin Kschwendt | 6-3 6-4 | Nana Smith | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Kschwendt | #507 | #37 | 426 | 1,712 | 79 | 116 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nana Smith | #669 | #51 | 332 | 1,649 | 65 | 114 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Kschwendt | Nana Smith | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,495 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #103 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #113 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #144 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #118 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #88 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 1–11 | 8.3% | #317 | 1,445 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1992 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #58 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1993 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #128 | 1,545 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #70 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #85 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #105 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #117 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1997 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #172 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #134 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #218 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |