H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Karin Kschwendt vs Shi-Ting Wang H2H: 2-1
Karin Kschwendt holds a 2–1 lead over Shi-Ting Wang in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Karin Kschwendt leads 2–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Shi-Ting Wang won the 1997 Tokyo fourth round 6-2 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUT
Age 57
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
TPE
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 1997* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Shi-Ting Wang | 6-2 6-4 | Karin Kschwendt | Match data |
| Apr 18, 1996* | Tokyo | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Karin Kschwendt | 6-2 6-2 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
| Jan 4, 1996* | Auckland | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Karin Kschwendt | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Shi-Ting Wang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karin Kschwendt | #507 | #37 | 426 | 1,712 | 79 | 116 | 40.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Shi-Ting Wang | #457 | #26 | 707 | 1,832 | 128 | 105 | 54.9% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karin Kschwendt | Shi-Ting Wang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,479 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 21–9 | 70.0% | #30 | 1,780 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 1989 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #178 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 21–12 | 63.6% | #42 | 1,775 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1990 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #116 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 17–9 | 65.4% | #44 | 1,776 | 0 | 4 |
| 22 | 1991 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #88 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 25–15 | 62.5% | #40 | 1,805 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 1992 | 4–7 | 36.4% | #77 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #68 | 1,682 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 1993 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #81 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 13–17 | 43.3% | #58 | 1,642 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 1994 | 9–15 | 37.5% | #99 | 1,610 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #153 | 1,583 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 1995 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #85 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 1996 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #53 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 1997 | 1–12 | 7.7% | #172 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #413 | 1,516 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |