H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karina Habsudova vs Fang Li H2H: 1-1
Karina Habsudova and Fang Li are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karina Habsudova leads 1–0 on clay, while Fang Li leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karina Habsudova won the 1999 Portschach third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 8, 1999* | Portschach | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Karina Habsudova | 6-3 6-4 | Fang Li | Match data |
| Sep 2, 1992* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Fang Li | 7-5 6-0 | Karina Habsudova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karina Habsudova | #792 | #10 | 2,022 | 1,953 | 168 | 172 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Fang Li | #488 | #36 | 723 | 1,705 | 67 | 89 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Karina Habsudova | Fang Li | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #124 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #119 | 1,547 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #54 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #66 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #67 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #113 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 9–8 | 52.9% | #93 | 1,613 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #199 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1995 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #69 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 1996 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #40 | 1,676 | 0 | 0 |
| 1997 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #86 | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 1998 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #503 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 1999 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #488 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #85 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #123 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |