H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karina Habsudova vs Laura Arraya H2H: 1-2
Laura Arraya holds a 2–1 lead over Karina Habsudova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts, while Laura Arraya leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Karina Habsudova won the 1992 Los Angeles third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
2
3 main draw meetings
PER
Age 62
Right-Handed
173 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 13, 1992* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Karina Habsudova | 6-1 6-4 | Laura Arraya | Match data |
| Feb 9, 1992* | Osaka | WTA 250 | SF | Carpet | Laura Arraya | 6-3 6-7 6-1 | Karina Habsudova | Match data |
| Mar 6, 1991* | Boca Raton | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Laura Arraya | 6-4 6-3 | Karina Habsudova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karina Habsudova | #792 | #10 | 2,022 | 1,953 | 168 | 172 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Laura Arraya | #192 | #14 | 51 | 1,922 | 270 | 204 | 57.0% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karina Habsudova | Laura Arraya | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #124 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #54 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | 1981 | 19–8 | 70.4% | — | 1,683 | 0 | 4 |
| 18 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #66 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1982 | 33–17 | 66.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 7 |
| 19 | 1993 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #113 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1983 | 23–23 | 50.0% | — | 1,713 | 0 | 7 |
| 20 | 1994 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 29–18 | 61.7% | #34 | 1,760 | 0 | 8 |
| 21 | 1995 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 17–21 | 44.7% | #63 | 1,693 | 0 | 8 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #33 | 1,718 | 0 | 8 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #45 | 1,770 | 0 | 8 |
| 24 | 1998 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 27–12 | 69.2% | #19 | 1,882 | 0 | 10 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #85 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 26–19 | 57.8% | #21 | 1,821 | 0 | 10 |
| 27 | 2001 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #123 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #24 | 1,823 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1992 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #45 | 1,734 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #71 | 1,683 | 0 | 10 |