H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karina Habsudova vs Linda Ferrando H2H: 0-1
Linda Ferrando holds a 1–0 lead over Karina Habsudova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Linda Ferrando leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Linda Ferrando won the 1993 Prague fourth round 6-3 0-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ITA
Age 60
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 1993* | Prague | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Linda Ferrando | 6-3 0-6 6-1 | Karina Habsudova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karina Habsudova | #792 | #10 | 2,022 | 1,953 | 168 | 172 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Linda Ferrando | #474 | #36 | 42 | 1,734 | 87 | 101 | 46.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karina Habsudova | Linda Ferrando | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #124 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 1991 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #54 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #66 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1993 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #113 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #221 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1994 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,795 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1995 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #154 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1996 | 36–21 | 63.2% | #11 | 1,863 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #67 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,756 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #44 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1998 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #70 | 1,686 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #67 | 1,652 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1999 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #49 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #94 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2000 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #85 | 1,648 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2001 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #123 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #52 | 1,668 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #84 | 1,640 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #474 | 1,622 | 0 | 0 |