H2H data updated: 2026-09-13 00:00 UTC

Karina Habsudova vs Lori Mcneil H2H: 0-1

Lori Mcneil holds a 1–0 lead over Karina Habsudova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Lori Mcneil leads 1–0 on carpet. Most recently, Lori Mcneil won the 1992 Tokyo Pan Pacific round of 32 7-5 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karina Habsudova
SVK Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Lori Mcneil
USA Age 62 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Lori Mcneil #21 7-5 6-3 Karina Habsudova #58 Match data Jan 31, 1992* R32 Tokyo Pan Pacific Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Carpet

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karina Habsudova #792 #10 2,022 1,953 172 174 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Lori Mcneil #867 #9 303 2,024 377 273 58.0% 0 0 0 1 10 11

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karina Habsudova Lori Mcneil
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 2–1 66.7% #124 1,536 0 0 1980 0–1 0.0% — 1,484 0 0
17 1991 14–15 48.3% #54 1,671 0 0 1981 2–0 100.0% — 1,520 0 1
18 1992 9–14 39.1% #66 1,663 0 0 1982 1–2 33.3% — 1,503 0 1
19 1993 7–12 36.8% #113 1,627 0 0 1983 6–5 54.5% — 1,568 0 1
20 1994 15–12 55.6% #31 1,795 0 0 1984 7–11 38.9% #97 1,608 0 1
21 1995 14–13 51.9% #56 1,732 0 0 1985 13–23 36.1% #93 1,587 0 1
22 1996 38–22 63.3% #11 1,858 0 0 1986 42–22 65.6% #14 1,884 0 3
23 1997 23–23 50.0% #29 1,755 0 0 1987 54–24 69.2% #11 2,007 0 3
24 1998 9–17 34.6% #70 1,685 0 0 1988 46–20 69.7% #13 1,901 0 5
25 1999 21–15 58.3% #49 1,762 0 1 1989 24–22 52.2% #36 1,760 0 6
26 2000 14–20 41.2% #85 1,672 0 1 1990 17–20 45.9% #52 1,695 0 6
27 2001 6–10 37.5% #123 1,620 0 1 1991 39–21 65.0% #19 1,870 0 8
28 — — — — — — — 1992 37–20 64.9% #15 1,962 0 9
29 — — — — — — — 1993 27–19 58.7% #25 1,898 0 10
30 — — — — — — — 1994 26–15 63.4% #17 1,871 0 11
31 — — — — — — — 1995 19–19 50.0% #34 1,804 0 11
32 — — — — — — — 1996 8–14 36.4% #83 1,727 0 11
33 — — — — — — — 1997 1–7 12.5% #301 1,656 0 11
34 — — — — — — — 1998 8–6 57.1% #91 1,718 0 11
35 — — — — — — — 1999 0–2 0.0% #869 1,670 0 11

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karina Habsudova Lori Mcneil
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 — — — — — — — — — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1982 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1993 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 1983 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
20 1994 7 5 12 58.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 1 1 0.0%
21 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1985 5 7 12 41.7% 3 7 10 30.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 4 7 42.9%
22 1996 18 9 27 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1986 20 7 27 74.1% 4 5 9 44.4% 10 4 14 71.4% 8 6 14 57.1%
23 1997 7 8 15 46.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1987 19 6 25 76.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 9 6 15 60.0% 19 8 27 70.4%
24 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1988 22 10 32 68.8% 8 4 12 66.7% 12 3 15 80.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 1989 10 8 18 55.6% 4 5 9 44.4% 4 4 8 50.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
26 2000 10 8 18 55.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1990 8 11 19 42.1% 0 3 3 0.0% 8 3 11 72.7% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 24 10 34 70.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 6 3 9 66.7% 8 6 14 57.1%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 13 9 22 59.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 10 2 12 83.3% 11 6 17 64.7%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 11 8 19 57.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 10 2 12 83.3% 4 4 8 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 6 6 12 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 11 2 13 84.6% 5 4 9 55.6%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 4 7 11 36.4% 1 4 5 20.0% 7 3 10 70.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 3 6 9 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 1 4 5 20.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 5 3 8 62.5% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 81 74 155 52.3% 63 51 114 55.3% 5 14 19 26.3% 23 35 58 39.7% — 160 110 270 59.3% 39 52 91 42.9% 99 49 148 66.9% 77 60 137 56.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karina Habsudova Lori Mcneil
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1536 111.6 — — — — +46 — — 71.4% +0.71 0–1 — — +0.07 1980 1485 95.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.17
17 1991 1671 136.1 — — — — +23 -123 — 45.5% -0.32 6–2 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 109.6 -0.26 1981 1521 104.9 — — — — — — — 100.0% +4.50 — — — +0.24
18 1992 1663 140.8 — — — — +26 -85 — 41.5% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.32 1982 1503 100.0 — — — — — — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–1 — +0.35
19 1993 1628 125.7 — — — — +14 -50 — 46.8% -0.19 1–8 (11%) 0–3 (0%) — +0.06 1983 1569 107.1 — — — — +44 — — 53.8% +0.19 2–2 (50%) 0–1 — +1.06
20 1994 1796 152.2 — — — — -42 -99 — 54.2% +0.44 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 -1.38 1984 1608 115.2 — — — — +12 -54 +10 38.1% -0.81 4–2 (67%) 1–1 — +0.27
21 1995 1732 138.3 — — — — -6 -18 — 54.1% +0.26 2–5 (29%) 3–0 (100%) 98.2 -0.36 1985 1587 118.3 — — — — +22 -103 +5 39.2% -0.85 2–5 (29%) 3–5 (38%) 96.4 -0.20
22 1996 1858 158.9 — — — — -42 +41 — 59.1% +0.66 12–7 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 106.8 -1.42 1986 1884 144.9 — — — — -9 -341 -107 60.5% +0.68 16–10 (62%) 12–9 (57%) 109.2 +1.49
23 1997 1756 144.1 — — — — +44 +38 -146 50.0% +0.07 7–7 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.12 1987 2007 158.4 — — — — +54 -355 -205 63.8% +0.91 16–9 (64%) 12–1 (92%) 109.8 -0.78
24 1998 1685 132.5 — — — — +56 +60 — 40.0% -0.83 4–6 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 100.9 -2.04 1988 1901 142.6 — — — — +37 -185 +39 62.9% +0.76 19–10 (66%) 8–5 (62%) 105.0 +2.06
25 1999 1763 138.7 — — — — -39 +74 -212 56.6% +0.40 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.5 -1.31 1989 1760 134.7 — — — — +60 -78 +79 52.0% +0.07 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) 96.3 -0.23
26 2000 1673 123.7 — — — — +62 +17 — 42.7% -0.65 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -0.77 1990 1695 134.9 — — — — +14 -74 +200 48.2% -0.08 4–9 (31%) 5–6 (45%) 90.4 -0.80
27 2001 1621 107.3 — — — — +71 +3 — 37.8% -0.87 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 -0.16 1991 1870 151.0 — — — — +12 -241 +42 60.4% +0.77 13–6 (68%) 9–10 (47%) 104.2 -0.74
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1992 1962 156.8 — — — — -4 -303 +76 63.6% +0.94 8–10 (44%) 10–9 (53%) 96.7 -0.46
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1899 147.7 — — — — -6 -291 +192 58.1% +0.61 6–7 (46%) 3–9 (25%) 95.3 -0.38
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1994 1871 145.9 — — — — -58 -207 +244 61.1% +0.69 7–8 (47%) 7–5 (58%) 98.9 -0.52
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1805 142.2 — — — — -13 -206 +304 53.8% +0.38 5–12 (29%) 4–8 (33%) 91.4 -0.26
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1996 1727 130.2 — — — — -12 — +384 36.5% -0.65 5–3 (63%) 2–7 (22%) 96.5 -0.48
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1656 120.2 — — — — +31 — — 22.2% -1.61 0–2 0–1 — -1.12
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1719 129.4 — — — — +1 -154 +315 51.4% +0.09 5–2 (71%) 0–2 — -0.58
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1671 99.0 — — — — — — — 20.0% -0.80 0–1 0–1 — +0.18
Career — 1953 148.2 — — — — +10 +8 -174 49.9% -0.03 52–53 (50%) 33–27 (55%) 103.8 -2.25 — 2025 149.2 — — — — +14 -212 +86 56.0% +0.41 117–106 (52%) 81–87 (48%) 98.3 -0.11

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.