H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC

Karina Habsudova vs Mary Joe Fernandez H2H: 1-4

Mary Joe Fernandez holds a 4–1 lead over Karina Habsudova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Mary Joe Fernandez leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Karina Habsudova won the 1996 Filderstadt third round 6-3 7-6.

SVK Age 52 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
Age 54 Right-Handed 176 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Oct 10, 1996* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Karina Habsudova #19 6-3 7-6 Mary Joe Fernandez #9 Match data
Jun 28, 1995* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #14 5-7 6-3 6-3 Karina Habsudova #27 Match data
Jun 22, 1994* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Mary Joe Fernandez #12 6-4 6-2 Karina Habsudova #54 Match data
May 25, 1994* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-4 3-6 6-1 Karina Habsudova #58 Match data
Oct 17, 1991* Filderstadt WTA 250 R32 Hard Mary Joe Fernandez #7 6-0 6-4 Karina Habsudova #89 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Karina Habsudova #792 #10 2,022 1,953 168 172 49.4% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Mary Joe Fernandez #136 #4 2,114 2,191 409 192 68.1% 0 3 0 1 3 7

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karina Habsudova Mary Joe Fernandez
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
12 1984 0–2 0.0% 1,475 0 0
13 1985 5–6 45.5% #99 1,554 0 0
14 1986 18–14 56.2% #27 1,764 0 0
15 1987 24–14 63.2% #20 1,895 0 0
16 1990 2–1 66.7% #124 1,536 0 0 1988 22–11 66.7% #15 1,922 0 0
17 1991 14–15 48.3% #54 1,671 0 0 1989 32–15 68.1% #12 1,977 0 0
18 1992 9–14 39.1% #66 1,663 0 0 1990 40–10 80.0% #4 2,123 0 2
19 1993 7–12 36.8% #113 1,627 0 0 1991 47–18 72.3% #8 2,062 0 2
20 1994 15–12 55.6% #31 1,795 0 0 1992 47–16 74.6% #6 2,108 0 2
21 1995 14–13 51.9% #56 1,732 0 0 1993 34–13 72.3% #7 2,054 0 3
22 1996 36–21 63.2% #11 1,863 0 0 1994 21–9 70.0% #14 1,975 0 4
23 1997 23–23 50.0% #29 1,756 0 0 1995 29–11 72.5% #8 2,038 0 6
24 1998 9–17 34.6% #70 1,686 0 0 1996 26–15 63.4% #16 1,926 0 6
25 1999 21–15 58.3% #49 1,763 0 1 1997 39–16 70.9% #10 1,987 0 7
26 2000 12–19 38.7% #85 1,648 0 1 1998 8–8 50.0% #77 1,932 0 7
27 2001 6–10 37.5% #123 1,608 0 1 1999 17–13 56.7% #38 1,890 0 7
28 2000 0–1 0.0% #136 1,869 0 7