H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Karina Habsudova vs Meike Babel H2H: 1-1

Karina Habsudova and Meike Babel are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meike Babel leads 1–0 on carpet, while Karina Habsudova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meike Babel won the 1995 Linz Open round of 16 6-4 6-2.

SVK Age 53 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1 1
2 main-draw meetings
GER Age 51 Right-Handed 173 cm / 5'8"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Meike Babel #60 6-4 6-2 Karina Habsudova #25 Match data Feb 24, 1995* R16 Linz Open Tier III modern equivalent WTA 250 Carpet
Karina Habsudova #29 2-6 6-1 6-3 Meike Babel #45 Match data Jan 22, 1995* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karina Habsudova #792 #10 2,022 1,953 172 174 49.7% 0 0 0 0 1 1
Meike Babel #446 #27 377 1,784 71 86 45.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karina Habsudova Meike Babel
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 1990 2–1 66.7% #124 1,536 0 0 1991 0–2 0.0% #134 1,486 0 0
17 1991 14–15 48.3% #54 1,671 0 0 1992 10–18 35.7% #86 1,523 0 0
18 1992 9–14 39.1% #66 1,663 0 0 1993 17–15 53.1% #49 1,616 0 0
19 1993 7–12 36.8% #113 1,627 0 0 1994 13–12 52.0% #46 1,660 0 0
20 1994 15–12 55.6% #31 1,795 0 0 1995 14–10 58.3% #32 1,751 0 0
21 1995 14–13 51.9% #56 1,732 0 0
22 1996 38–22 63.3% #11 1,858 0 0 1997 7–8 46.7% #116 1,702 0 0
23 1997 23–23 50.0% #29 1,755 0 0 1998 9–16 36.0% #100 1,643 0 0
24 1998 9–17 34.6% #70 1,685 0 0
25 1999 21–15 58.3% #49 1,762 0 1 2000 1–5 16.7% #425 1,571 0 0
26 2000 14–20 41.2% #85 1,672 0 1
27 2001 6–10 37.5% #123 1,620 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karina Habsudova Meike Babel
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 1990 2 1 3 66.7% 1991 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 1991 10 9 19 52.6% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1992 4 10 14 28.6% 6 6 12 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1992 4 7 11 36.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 1993 6 4 10 60.0% 11 8 19 57.9% 0 3 3 0.0%
19 1993 4 8 12 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1994 1 2 3 33.3% 5 7 12 41.7% 1 1 2 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
20 1994 7 5 12 58.3% 8 5 13 61.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1995 4 3 7 57.1% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
21 1995 7 6 13 53.8% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
22 1996 18 9 27 66.7% 15 5 20 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 1997 1 3 4 25.0% 6 4 10 60.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1997 7 8 15 46.7% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 5 5 10 50.0% 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1998 3 5 8 37.5% 4 6 10 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 4 6 33.3%
25 1999 8 6 14 57.1% 11 4 15 73.3% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 3 4 25.0% 2000 0 1 1 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 2000 10 8 18 55.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0%
27 2001 3 3 6 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
Career 81 74 155 52.3% 63 51 114 55.3% 5 14 19 26.3% 23 35 58 39.7% 20 31 51 39.2% 40 42 82 48.8% 2 4 6 33.3% 9 9 18 50.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karina Habsudova Meike Babel
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 1990 1536 111.6 +46 71.4% +0.71 0–1 +0.07 1991 1486 116.6 20.0% -2.20 0–1 -0.11
17 1991 1671 136.1 +23 -123 45.5% -0.32 6–2 (75%) 3–0 (100%) 109.6 -0.26 1992 1524 111.1 0 +43 36.1% -1.25 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 106.5 +0.29
18 1992 1663 140.8 +26 -85 41.5% -0.74 3–4 (43%) 3–0 (100%) 102.0 -1.32 1993 1617 122.8 -68 +61 46.9% -0.30 4–4 (50%) 1–2 (33%) 100.1 +0.80
19 1993 1628 125.7 +14 -50 46.8% -0.19 1–8 (11%) 0–3 (0%) +0.06 1994 1660 133.6 -29 -5 55.6% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 95.6 +1.21
20 1994 1796 152.2 -42 -99 54.2% +0.44 3–2 (60%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 -1.38 1995 1752 137.0 -21 -74 59.3% +0.56 2–4 (33%) 3–1 (75%) 100.5 -2.02
21 1995 1732 138.3 -6 -18 54.1% +0.26 2–5 (29%) 3–0 (100%) 98.2 -0.36
22 1996 1858 158.9 -42 +41 59.1% +0.66 12–7 (63%) 8–6 (57%) 106.8 -1.42 1997 1703 118.3 -34 +27 40.0% -0.43 2–0 0–5 (0%) +0.22
23 1997 1756 144.1 +44 +38 -146 50.0% +0.07 7–7 (50%) 3–6 (33%) 98.1 +1.12 1998 1643 129.8 +3 +57 42.9% -0.63 2–3 (40%) 1–1 -1.62
24 1998 1685 132.5 +56 +60 40.0% -0.83 4–6 (40%) 3–0 (100%) 100.9 -2.04
25 1999 1763 138.7 -39 +74 -212 56.6% +0.40 6–5 (55%) 3–2 (60%) 100.5 -1.31 2000 1572 85.7 +26 15.4% -2.62 1–0 0–1 +0.31
26 2000 1673 123.7 +62 +17 42.7% -0.65 5–4 (56%) 5–5 (50%) 101.6 -0.77
27 2001 1621 107.3 +71 +3 37.8% -0.87 3–2 (60%) 2–2 (50%) 99.0 -0.16
Career 1953 148.2 +10 +8 -174 49.9% -0.03 52–53 (50%) 33–27 (55%) 103.8 -2.25 1784 130.2 -23 +23 45.5% -0.38 18–18 (50%) 8–17 (32%) 98.2 -0.59

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.