H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karolina Sprem vs Arantxa Parra Santonja H2H: 1-0
Karolina Sprem holds a 1–0 lead over Arantxa Parra Santonja in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2005 Miami second round 6-3 1-6 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 43
Right-Handed
176 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 25, 2005* | Miami | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Karolina Sprem | 6-3 1-6 6-4 | Arantxa Parra Santonja | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Arantxa Parra Santonja | #858 | #46 | 1,231 | 1,625 | 71 | 120 | 37.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Sprem | Arantxa Parra Santonja | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 10–11 | 47.6% | #67 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #70 | 1,594 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 13–21 | 38.2% | #109 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 1–9 | 10.0% | #175 | 1,429 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #366 | 1,415 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #299 | 1,422 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #93 | 1,409 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #65 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #117 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #229 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |