H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Karolina Sprem vs Denisa Chladkova H2H: 2-0
Karolina Sprem holds a 2–0 lead over Denisa Chladkova in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2004 Antwerp quarterfinal 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 47
Right-Handed
174 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 21, 2004* | Antwerp | WTA 500 | QF | Hard | Karolina Sprem | 6-4 6-3 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2003* | Vienna | WTA 250 | QF | Clay | Karolina Sprem | 6-3 6-2 | Denisa Chladkova | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Denisa Chladkova | #655 | #31 | 983 | 1,740 | 129 | 165 | 43.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Sprem | Denisa Chladkova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #190 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 4–2 | 66.7% | #77 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 11–18 | 37.9% | #54 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 4–19 | 17.4% | #119 | 1,440 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #58 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #50 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #50 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #63 | 1,642 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #43 | 1,666 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 21–20 | 51.2% | #54 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #127 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |