H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Karolina Sprem vs Jelena Kostanic Tosic H2H: 1-1
Karolina Sprem and Jelena Kostanic Tosic are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on clay, while Jelena Kostanic Tosic leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2006 Istanbul third round 6-2 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
CRO
Age 45
Left-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2006* | Istanbul | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Karolina Sprem | 6-2 7-6(3) | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | Match data |
| Sep 1, 2004* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | 6-3 2-6 6-4 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Jelena Kostanic Tosic | #937 | #32 | 900 | 1,726 | 112 | 151 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Sprem | Jelena Kostanic Tosic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #240 | 1,490 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 10–13 | 43.5% | #114 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 4–4 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 14–17 | 45.2% | #70 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 16–20 | 44.4% | #66 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 22–25 | 46.8% | #35 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #87 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #51 | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #103 | 1,534 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #830 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |