H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Karolina Sprem vs Lindsay Davenport H2H: 0-5

Lindsay Davenport holds a 5–0 lead over Karolina Sprem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Lindsay Davenport leads 3–0 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Lindsay Davenport won the 2008 Amelia Island fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karolina Sprem
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 5
5 main draw meetings
Lindsay Davenport
USA Age 50 Right-Handed 189 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 11, 2008* Amelia Island WTA 500 R16 Clay Lindsay Davenport #30 6-4 3-6 6-4 Karolina Sprem #296 Match data
Jan 19, 2006* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 7-6(4) 6-3 Karolina Sprem #66 Match data
Jan 25, 2005* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Lindsay Davenport #1 6-2 6-2 Karolina Sprem #18 Match data
Jul 29, 2004* San Diego WTA 1000 R32 Hard Lindsay Davenport #4 6-4 6-0 Karolina Sprem #20 Match data
Jul 2, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Lindsay Davenport #5 6-2 6-2 Karolina Sprem #30 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Karolina Sprem #921 #17 1,504 1,867 91 103 46.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Lindsay Davenport #35 #1 6,100 2,353 704 190 78.7% 3 13 1 25 12 54

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karolina Sprem Lindsay Davenport
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1991 1–2 33.3% #348 1,504 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1992 2–5 28.6% #161 1,511 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #273 1,482 0 0 1993 31–15 67.4% #20 1,858 0 1
18 2003 12–8 60.0% #59 1,620 0 0 1994 44–15 74.6% #6 2,022 0 3
19 2004 30–22 57.7% #18 1,779 0 0 1995 31–14 68.9% #12 1,933 0 4
20 2005 15–23 39.5% #65 1,663 0 0 1996 41–15 73.2% #9 2,013 0 6
21 2006 12–16 42.9% #89 1,627 0 0 1997 57–16 78.1% #3 2,161 0 12
22 2007 4–5 44.4% #209 1,614 0 0 1998 68–14 82.9% #1 2,283 1 18
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #174 1,624 0 0 1999 58–11 84.1% #2 2,297 2 25
24 2009 3–8 27.3% #92 1,569 0 0 2000 56–13 81.2% #2 2,228 3 29
25 2010 8–12 40.0% #94 1,562 0 0 2001 64–10 86.5% #1 2,275 3 36
26 2011 0–1 0.0% #817 1,544 0 0 2002 24–9 72.7% #12 2,153 3 36
27 — — — — — — — 2003 48–15 76.2% #5 2,076 3 37
28 — — — — — — — 2004 64–10 86.5% #1 2,203 3 44
29 — — — — — — — 2005 58–11 84.1% #1 2,199 3 50
30 — — — — — — — 2006 21–8 72.4% #25 2,122 3 50
31 — — — — — — — 2007 13–1 92.9% #72 2,147 3 52
32 — — — — — — — 2008 23–6 79.3% #35 2,063 3 54