H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karolina Sprem vs Magdalena Maleeva H2H: 2-0
Karolina Sprem holds a 2–0 lead over Magdalena Maleeva in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2004 Wimbledon fourth round 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
BUL
Age 51
Right-Handed
168 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 30, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R16 | Grass | Karolina Sprem | 6-4 6-4 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
| Apr 8, 2004* | Amelia Island | WTA 500 | R32 | Clay | Karolina Sprem | 6-2 6-4 | Magdalena Maleeva | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Magdalena Maleeva | #401 | #4 | 1,834 | 2,083 | 384 | 272 | 58.5% | 0 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Sprem | Magdalena Maleeva | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #216 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #72 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #38 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 28–14 | 66.7% | #20 | 1,908 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 36–16 | 69.2% | #16 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 31–12 | 72.1% | #11 | 1,980 | 0 | 3 |
| 20 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 37–12 | 75.5% | #6 | 2,029 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #19 | 1,908 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,746 | 0 | 6 |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #116 | 1,713 | 0 | 6 |
| 24 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #76 | 1,737 | 0 | 7 |
| 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 25–25 | 50.0% | #23 | 1,813 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #16 | 1,849 | 0 | 8 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 35–24 | 59.3% | #14 | 1,855 | 0 | 9 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 27–21 | 56.2% | #30 | 1,746 | 0 | 10 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #25 | 1,710 | 0 | 10 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #53 | 1,682 | 0 | 10 |