H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Karolina Sprem vs Maureen Drake H2H: 1-0

Karolina Sprem holds a 1–0 lead over Maureen Drake in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2004 Canadian Open round of 64 6-2 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karolina Sprem
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Maureen Drake
CAN Age 55 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Karolina Sprem #19 6-2 6-1 Maureen Drake #161 Match data Aug 4, 2004* R64 Canadian Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karolina Sprem #921 #17 1,504 1,854 93 104 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Maureen Drake #1,132 #47 612 1,586 40 93 30.1% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karolina Sprem Maureen Drake
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #273 1,482 0 0 1988 2–4 33.3% #275 1,497 0 0
18 2003 12–8 60.0% #59 1,603 0 0 1989 3–5 37.5% #163 1,505 0 0
19 2004 32–23 58.2% #18 1,761 0 0 1990 1–5 16.7% #209 1,463 0 0
20 2005 15–23 39.5% #65 1,659 0 0 1991 1–3 25.0% #198 1,451 0 0
21 2006 12–16 42.9% #89 1,626 0 0 1992 0–5 0.0% #188 1,412 0 0
22 2007 4–5 44.4% #209 1,612 0 0 1993 3–10 23.1% #171 1,416 0 0
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #174 1,623 0 0 1994 1–3 25.0% #170 1,411 0 0
24 2009 3–8 27.3% #92 1,568 0 0 1995 2–2 50.0% #165 1,455 0 0
25 2010 8–12 40.0% #94 1,562 0 0 1996 1–5 16.7% #173 1,432 0 0
26 2011 0–1 0.0% #817 1,544 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #159 1,423 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 1998 0–1 0.0% #130 1,412 0 0
28 — — — — — — — 1999 12–15 44.4% #57 1,554 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2000 5–12 29.4% #147 1,503 0 0
30 — — — — — — — 2001 1–3 25.0% #161 1,493 0 0
31 — — — — — — — 2002 4–6 40.0% #99 1,519 0 0
32 — — — — — — — 2003 3–8 27.3% #115 1,500 0 0
33 — — — — — — — 2004 0–4 0.0% #191 1,460 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2005 1–1 50.0% #278 1,466 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karolina Sprem Maureen Drake
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1988 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1989 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2004 17 14 31 54.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1990 0 4 4 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1991 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 2 10 12 16.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1992 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1993 2 6 8 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3%
23 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
24 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1995 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 8 9 17 47.1% 3 4 7 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 4 6 10 40.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 51 88 42.0% 42 38 80 52.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 23 57 80 28.8% 8 18 26 30.8% 5 11 16 31.2% 4 7 11 36.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karolina Sprem Maureen Drake
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 2002 1483 93.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.14 1988 1498 102.4 — — — — +27 — — 35.7% -1.07 1–1 0–1 — -0.20
18 2003 1604 127.0 -1.05 -1.09 0.686 41.7% — +85 — 51.0% +0.04 8–3 (73%) 2–3 (40%) 108.1 -0.54 1989 1505 108.3 — — — — +37 — — 38.9% -0.78 1–1 1–1 — +0.46
19 2004 1761 145.8 -0.31 -1.03 0.870 47.2% -93 -1 -10 58.1% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 -1.22 1990 1464 106.0 — — — — +29 — — 26.7% -1.87 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.61
20 2005 1659 133.4 -3.79 +1.69 0.885 46.7% +25 +35 — 42.7% -0.76 5–8 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 -0.42 1991 1451 96.1 — — — — +36 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–1 — — +0.35
21 2006 1626 122.4 -0.58 -0.67 0.970 49.8% -80 +129 +85 43.8% -0.23 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 -0.32 1992 1413 99.9 — — — — +25 — — 16.7% -2.25 0–2 — — +0.07
22 2007 1613 105.7 -1.15 -1.26 0.864 47.0% — +130 — 47.6% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.37 1993 1416 110.2 — — — — +28 — — 30.0% -1.30 1–3 (25%) 0–1 — -0.21
23 2008 1624 118.5 +1.82 +0.88 1.087 52.2% — +63 — 54.3% +0.43 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 94.8 -0.54 1994 1412 100.5 — — — — +30 — — 30.0% -1.10 1–1 0–1 — +0.13
24 2009 1569 117.7 +0.90 -2.06 0.883 47.8% -19 +54 — 40.7% -0.70 0–5 (0%) — — -0.09 1995 1455 122.0 — — — — +21 — — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 0–2 — -0.19
25 2010 1563 118.6 +2.17 -2.28 0.992 49.6% +13 -2 +117 44.4% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.13 1996 1433 102.9 — — — — +40 — — 21.4% -1.71 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.04
26 2011 1545 98.1 +0.35 -2.30 0.871 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 1997 1424 99.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — 0–1 — +0.01
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1413 103.2 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.01
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1555 130.6 — — — — +12 -37 -32 45.0% -0.32 3–3 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 102.7 +0.23
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1503 118.0 — — — — +70 -25 — 34.2% -0.97 1–3 (25%) 3–3 (50%) 98.9 +0.30
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2001 1494 98.3 — — — — — — -13 33.3% -0.89 0–1 0–1 — +0.11
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1519 116.5 — — — — +20 — -7 48.0% -0.12 1–4 (20%) 1–3 (25%) 95.6 +0.14
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1501 105.5 -0.96 -1.21 0.910 48.8% -7 -23 — 35.7% -0.93 2–4 (33%) 1–3 (25%) 97.8 +0.08
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1461 95.4 -2.78 -1.48 0.811 45.3% -19 — — 11.1% -2.78 0–1 — — +0.03
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1467 97.0 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.50 — — — +0.11
Career — 1855 135.3 +0.29 -0.90 0.944 48.9% -39 +66 +51 48.8% -0.08 29–44 (40%) 18–17 (51%) 95.7 -1.18 — 1586 118.4 -1.69 -1.32 0.868 47.4% +26 -30 -16 35.1% -1.00 14–30 (32%) 10–24 (29%) 89.2 +1.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.