H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Karolina Sprem vs Meghann Shaughnessy H2H: 3-2

Karolina Sprem holds a 3–2 lead over Meghann Shaughnessy in their WTA head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Karolina Sprem leads 2–0 on clay, while Meghann Shaughnessy leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karolina Sprem won the 2007 Amelia Island second round 6-4 7-6(5).

CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
USA Age 47 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Apr 4, 2007* Amelia Island WTA 500 R64 Clay Karolina Sprem #107 6-4 7-6(5) Meghann Shaughnessy #49 Match data
Oct 28, 2004* Linz WTA 500 R32 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #44 7-5 4-6 6-1 Karolina Sprem #18 Match data
Jun 27, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Karolina Sprem #30 7-6(5) 7-6(2) Meghann Shaughnessy #35 Match data
May 6, 2004* Berlin WTA 1000 R32 Clay Karolina Sprem #29 6-2 7-6(3) Meghann Shaughnessy #40 Match data
Aug 27, 2003* US Open Grand Slam R128 Hard Meghann Shaughnessy #21 6-3 6-2 Karolina Sprem #66 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Karolina Sprem #921 #17 1,504 1,867 91 103 46.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Meghann Shaughnessy #1,104 #11 1,949 1,888 233 233 50.0% 0 0 0 0 6 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karolina Sprem Meghann Shaughnessy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #273 1,482 0 0 1996 3–4 42.9% #165 1,512 0 0
18 2003 12–8 60.0% #59 1,620 0 0 1997 0–1 0.0% #198 1,499 0 0
19 2004 30–22 57.7% #18 1,779 0 0 1998 8–9 47.1% #69 1,544 0 0
20 2005 15–23 39.5% #65 1,663 0 0 1999 10–22 31.2% #99 1,439 0 0
21 2006 12–16 42.9% #89 1,627 0 0 2000 23–20 53.5% #38 1,652 0 1
22 2007 4–5 44.4% #209 1,614 0 0 2001 45–25 64.3% #12 1,825 0 2
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #174 1,624 0 0 2002 29–27 51.8% #30 1,716 0 2
24 2009 3–8 27.3% #92 1,569 0 0 2003 32–23 58.2% #17 1,725 0 3
25 2010 8–12 40.0% #94 1,562 0 0 2004 20–22 47.6% #40 1,663 0 3
26 2011 0–1 0.0% #817 1,544 0 0 2005 17–25 40.5% #66 1,563 0 3
27 2006 27–20 57.4% #37 1,709 0 5
28 2007 18–22 45.0% #52 1,666 0 6
29 2008 0–5 0.0% #836 1,579 0 6
30 2009 1–8 11.1% #590 1,533 0 6