H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Karolina Sprem vs Nathalie Dechy H2H: 1-1

Karolina Sprem and Nathalie Dechy are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Karolina Sprem leads 1–0 on clay, while Nathalie Dechy leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Dechy won the 2005 Stanford round of 32 6-2 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karolina Sprem
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
1 – 1
2 main-draw meetings
Nathalie Dechy
FRA Age 47 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Nathalie Dechy #18 6-2 6-3 Karolina Sprem #61 Match data Jul 28, 2005* R32 Stanford Tier II → modern equivalent WTA 500 Hard
Karolina Sprem #32 6-4 6-4 Nathalie Dechy #25 Match data Apr 14, 2004* R64 Charleston Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karolina Sprem #921 #17 1,504 1,854 93 104 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Nathalie Dechy #88 #11 1,773 1,918 293 272 51.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karolina Sprem Nathalie Dechy
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1995 0–2 0.0% #237 1,481 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #273 1,482 0 0 1996 6–11 35.3% #84 1,500 0 0
18 2003 12–8 60.0% #59 1,603 0 0 1997 6–11 35.3% #73 1,540 0 0
19 2004 32–23 58.2% #18 1,761 0 0 1998 12–17 41.4% #50 1,606 0 0
20 2005 15–23 39.5% #65 1,659 0 0 1999 32–23 58.2% #25 1,788 0 0
21 2006 12–16 42.9% #89 1,626 0 0 2000 30–20 60.0% #26 1,792 0 0
22 2007 4–5 44.4% #209 1,612 0 0 2001 21–25 45.7% #43 1,629 0 0
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #174 1,623 0 0 2002 33–24 57.9% #20 1,770 0 0
24 2009 3–8 27.3% #92 1,568 0 0 2003 31–18 63.3% #29 1,840 0 1
25 2010 8–12 40.0% #94 1,562 0 0 2004 33–24 57.9% #21 1,809 0 1
26 2011 0–1 0.0% #817 1,544 0 0 2005 40–26 60.6% #12 1,797 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2006 16–25 39.0% #48 1,648 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2007 16–19 45.7% #68 1,651 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2008 13–16 44.8% #69 1,670 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2009 4–11 26.7% #88 1,580 0 1

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karolina Sprem Nathalie Dechy
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
17 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1996 3 5 8 37.5% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
18 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1997 4 6 10 40.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
19 2004 17 14 31 54.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1998 4 7 11 36.4% 3 4 7 42.9% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
20 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1999 12 11 23 52.2% 10 6 16 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2006 2 10 12 16.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2000 14 11 25 56.0% 7 4 11 63.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
22 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 2001 10 13 23 43.5% 6 6 12 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0%
23 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2002 18 12 30 60.0% 10 6 16 62.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9%
24 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2003 13 7 20 65.0% 12 6 18 66.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0%
25 2010 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2004 28 16 44 63.6% 2 4 6 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 28 17 45 62.2% 6 5 11 54.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 8 15 23 34.8% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 8 10 18 44.4% 5 5 10 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 9 10 19 47.4% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 5 6 16.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2 1 3 66.7%
Career — 37 51 88 42.0% 42 38 80 52.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 160 145 305 52.5% 71 66 137 51.8% 34 33 67 50.7% 28 28 56 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 82/196 of Karolina Sprem's and 132/292 of Nathalie Dechy's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karolina Sprem Nathalie Dechy
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 2/20 2.5 6.0 49.5% 62.9% 34.7% 46.4% 27.5% 48.7% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 7/55 3.0 6.0 53.9% 63.7% 41.1% 57.9% 39.2% 53.4% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 7/38 1.0 4.9 42.9% 51.0% 42.0% 28.6% 37.0% 46.0% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 17/28 3.3 5.5 52.7% 63.5% 46.6% 60.8% 57.7% 55.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 7/9 2.4 6.0 50.3% 65.9% 41.1% 64.4% 45.9% 53.6% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 12/14 3.9 4.6 54.4% 68.0% 47.0% 58.2% 44.7% 58.6% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 10/11 3.9 6.2 53.2% 66.7% 44.2% 44.0% 40.1% 56.3% 38.6% 2003 7/49 1.7 4.9 64.0% 63.0% 50.3% 45.3% 45.3% 58.4% 50.8%
25 2010 19/20 4.6 4.8 51.2% 70.9% 48.0% 46.1% 35.3% 59.7% 39.9% 2004 8/57 1.9 3.4 68.4% 60.9% 50.1% 65.8% 62.3% 56.9% 44.5%
26 2011 1/1 8.0 11.0 54.1% 67.9% 31.1% 66.7% 45.5% 51.0% 42.7% 2005 18/66 1.4 3.2 69.7% 61.9% 48.5% 60.7% 55.8% 57.5% 44.6%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 31/41 1.6 2.8 72.6% 60.3% 44.3% 54.0% 44.4% 55.9% 42.0%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 27/35 1.1 3.0 72.8% 56.7% 43.7% 46.8% 46.2% 53.3% 42.4%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 26/29 1.7 4.7 64.9% 59.5% 41.5% 48.8% 54.7% 53.0% 43.2%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 15/15 1.3 3.5 68.6% 58.7% 41.0% 48.6% 48.4% 53.2% 39.3%
Career — 82/197 3.5 5.4 51.7% 65.4% 44.9% 52.0% 43.2% 55.6% 41.9% — 132/565 1.5 3.5 69.6% 59.6% 44.5% 52.1% 49.9% 54.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karolina Sprem Nathalie Dechy
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1995 1481 98.2 — — — — — — — 20.0% -2.40 0–1 1–0 — -0.03
17 2002 1483 93.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.14 1996 1501 112.9 — — — — +19 +53 — 38.5% -0.79 2–3 (40%) 1–0 — +0.56
18 2003 1604 127.0 -1.05 -1.09 0.686 41.7% — +85 — 51.0% +0.04 8–3 (73%) 2–3 (40%) 108.1 -0.54 1997 1540 124.8 — — — — -7 +9 — 42.9% -0.29 2–6 (25%) 1–1 — -0.35
19 2004 1761 145.8 -0.31 -1.03 0.870 47.2% -93 -1 -10 58.1% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 -1.22 1998 1607 125.9 — — — — -40 -52 +18 42.2% -0.42 3–5 (38%) 1–5 (17%) 95.8 +0.60
20 2005 1659 133.4 -3.79 +1.69 0.885 46.7% +25 +35 — 42.7% -0.76 5–8 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 -0.42 1999 1788 147.7 — — — — -63 -117 -80 55.1% +0.41 11–6 (65%) 6–4 (60%) 108.9 -1.15
21 2006 1626 122.4 -0.58 -0.67 0.970 49.8% -80 +129 +85 43.8% -0.23 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 -0.32 2000 1792 145.6 — — — — -2 -103 -48 58.7% +0.61 9–6 (60%) 5–4 (56%) 101.9 -1.62
22 2007 1613 105.7 -1.15 -1.26 0.864 47.0% — +130 — 47.6% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.37 2001 1629 124.7 — — — — +13 +69 +76 48.6% -0.06 7–12 (37%) 5–5 (50%) 93.7 -0.20
23 2008 1624 118.5 +1.82 +0.88 1.087 52.2% — +63 — 54.3% +0.43 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 94.8 -0.54 2002 1770 144.3 — — — — -37 +23 -68 56.2% +0.35 14–11 (56%) 10–4 (71%) 105.9 -0.89
24 2009 1569 117.7 +0.90 -2.06 0.883 47.8% -19 +54 — 40.7% -0.70 0–5 (0%) — — -0.09 2003 1840 138.9 +1.35 +3.00 1.221 54.2% -60 +48 -96 58.5% +0.48 12–2 (86%) 2–3 (40%) 108.2 -0.85
25 2010 1563 118.6 +2.17 -2.28 0.992 49.6% +13 -2 +117 44.4% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.13 2004 1810 147.7 +1.35 +0.63 1.034 51.1% +6 +3 -86 57.9% +0.62 7–9 (44%) 6–8 (43%) 95.0 -1.40
26 2011 1545 98.1 +0.35 -2.30 0.871 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 2005 1798 146.1 +1.56 +0.35 1.048 51.3% +22 -36 -11 56.8% +0.55 12–6 (67%) 9–10 (47%) 98.9 +1.39
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1648 128.2 +0.04 -1.40 0.952 49.0% -1 +72 +148 42.7% -0.42 7–9 (44%) 3–7 (30%) 92.6 +0.62
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1651 130.6 -1.46 -0.89 0.907 47.9% -3 +66 +97 45.6% -0.29 5–6 (45%) 4–8 (33%) 95.8 -1.91
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1671 130.8 -1.57 -0.33 0.919 48.2% +12 -28 +59 45.5% -0.24 4–4 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.7 -1.85
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1581 108.4 -1.61 -3.48 0.839 46.8% +48 +1 +106 32.4% -1.11 3–4 (43%) 1–3 (25%) 96.4 -0.41
Career — 1855 135.3 +0.29 -0.90 0.944 48.9% -39 +66 +51 48.8% -0.08 29–44 (40%) 18–17 (51%) 95.7 -1.18 — 1919 143.2 -0.42 -0.73 0.953 49.1% -9 0 -6 51.4% +0.13 98–90 (52%) 60–67 (47%) 96.4 -1.34

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.