H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karolina Sprem vs Nicole Vaidisova H2H: 0-2
Nicole Vaidisova holds a 2–0 lead over Karolina Sprem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Nicole Vaidisova leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nicole Vaidisova won the 2006 Wimbledon third round 7-5 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 37
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 1, 2006* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R32 | Grass | Nicole Vaidisova | 7-5 7-5 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
| Mar 11, 2005* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Nicole Vaidisova | 6-1 3-6 6-1 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Nicole Vaidisova | #832 | #7 | 1,981 | 1,997 | 155 | 84 | 64.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Sprem | Nicole Vaidisova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 14–5 | 73.7% | #75 | 1,674 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 45–14 | 76.3% | #15 | 1,948 | 0 | 5 |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #10 | 1,916 | 0 | 6 |
| 18 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 35–14 | 71.4% | #12 | 1,946 | 0 | 6 |
| 19 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #41 | 1,711 | 0 | 6 |
| 20 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #175 | 1,578 | 0 | 6 |
| 21 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #666 | 1,579 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #261 | 1,566 | 0 | 6 |