H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Karolina Sprem vs Paola Suarez H2H: 0-4
Paola Suarez holds a 4–0 lead over Karolina Sprem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Paola Suarez leads 2–0 on clay and 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Paola Suarez won the 2005 Rome second round 6-3 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CRO
Age 41
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0
–
4
4 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 11, 2005* | Rome | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 6-3 6-0 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
| Jan 17, 2004* | Canberra | WTA 250 | SF | Hard | Paola Suarez | 6-2 2-6 6-4 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
| Oct 23, 2003* | Linz | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard | Paola Suarez | 6-3 6-4 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
| Jun 15, 2003* | Vienna | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Paola Suarez | 7-6(0) 2-6 6-4 | Karolina Sprem | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Karolina Sprem | #921 | #17 | 1,504 | 1,867 | 91 | 103 | 46.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Karolina Sprem | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #273 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2003 | 12–8 | 60.0% | #59 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2004 | 30–22 | 57.7% | #18 | 1,779 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 15–23 | 39.5% | #65 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 12–16 | 42.9% | #89 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #209 | 1,614 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2008 | 7–7 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,624 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2009 | 3–8 | 27.3% | #92 | 1,569 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2010 | 8–12 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2011 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #817 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |