H2H data updated: 2026-09-14 00:00 UTC

Karolina Sprem vs Tamarine Tanasugarn H2H: 0-1

Tamarine Tanasugarn holds a 1–0 lead over Karolina Sprem in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamarine Tanasugarn leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Tamarine Tanasugarn won the 2005 Wimbledon first round 6-2 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Karolina Sprem
CRO Age 41 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Tamarine Tanasugarn
THA Age 49 Right-Handed 165 cm / 5'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Tamarine Tanasugarn #69 6-2 6-2 Karolina Sprem #31 Match data Jun 22, 2005* R128 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Karolina Sprem #921 #17 1,504 1,854 93 104 47.2% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Tamarine Tanasugarn #947 #19 1,508 1,825 268 276 49.3% 0 0 0 0 4 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Karolina Sprem Tamarine Tanasugarn
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
16 — — — — — — — 1993 0–1 0.0% #407 1,483 0 0
17 2002 0–1 0.0% #273 1,482 0 0 1994 1–1 50.0% #227 1,493 0 0
18 2003 12–8 60.0% #59 1,603 0 0 1995 2–5 28.6% #213 1,479 0 0
19 2004 32–23 58.2% #18 1,761 0 0 1996 9–5 64.3% #75 1,610 0 0
20 2005 15–23 39.5% #65 1,659 0 0 1997 18–20 47.4% #47 1,647 0 0
21 2006 12–16 42.9% #89 1,626 0 0 1998 20–21 48.8% #37 1,701 0 0
22 2007 4–5 44.4% #209 1,612 0 0 1999 8–13 38.1% #71 1,633 0 0
23 2008 7–7 50.0% #174 1,623 0 0 2000 31–19 62.0% #28 1,792 0 0
24 2009 3–8 27.3% #92 1,568 0 0 2001 24–21 53.3% #29 1,698 0 0
25 2010 8–12 40.0% #94 1,562 0 0 2002 32–26 55.2% #28 1,676 0 0
26 2011 0–1 0.0% #817 1,544 0 0 2003 28–23 54.9% #34 1,694 0 1
27 — — — — — — — 2004 19–25 43.2% #66 1,609 0 1
28 — — — — — — — 2005 7–16 30.4% #122 1,496 0 1
29 — — — — — — — 2006 9–7 56.2% #72 1,584 0 1
30 — — — — — — — 2007 9–18 33.3% #117 1,568 0 1
31 — — — — — — — 2008 19–16 54.3% #37 1,684 0 2
32 — — — — — — — 2009 10–12 45.5% #101 1,645 0 3
33 — — — — — — — 2010 14–9 60.9% #62 1,732 0 4
34 — — — — — — — 2011 4–10 28.6% #94 1,648 0 4
35 — — — — — — — 2012 4–7 36.4% #152 1,595 0 4
38 — — — — — — — 2015 0–1 0.0% #855 1,577 0 4

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Karolina Sprem Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 2002 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1994 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 2003 0 2 2 0.0% 11 5 16 68.8% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1995 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 17 14 31 54.8% 8 5 13 61.5% 5 2 7 71.4% 2 2 4 50.0% 1996 8 4 12 66.7% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
20 2005 12 15 27 44.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1997 12 11 23 52.2% 2 5 7 28.6% 3 3 6 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
21 2006 2 10 12 16.7% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 1998 15 12 27 55.6% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 1 1 0.0%
22 2007 0 2 2 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — — — — — — 1999 3 8 11 27.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — —
23 2008 1 1 2 50.0% 6 6 12 50.0% — — — — — — — — 2000 19 12 31 61.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 9 3 12 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
24 2009 1 2 3 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2001 18 15 33 54.5% 0 3 3 0.0% 6 3 9 66.7% — — — —
25 2010 4 4 8 50.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 3 5 40.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 24 16 40 60.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 3 3 6 50.0% 2 1 3 66.7%
26 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 21 16 37 56.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 2 1 3 66.7%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 13 18 31 41.9% 0 4 4 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 3 10 13 23.1% 0 4 4 0.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 7 6 13 53.8% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 7 12 19 36.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 8 12 20 40.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 11 2 13 84.6% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — —
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 12 5 17 70.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 3 9 12 25.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 37 51 88 42.0% 42 38 80 52.5% 10 10 20 50.0% 4 5 9 44.4% — 183 185 368 49.7% 12 47 59 20.3% 67 37 104 64.4% 6 7 13 46.2%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 82/196 of Karolina Sprem's and 141/267 of Tamarine Tanasugarn's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Karolina Sprem Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 2/20 2.5 6.0 49.5% 62.9% 34.7% 46.4% 27.5% 48.7% 35.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 7/55 3.0 6.0 53.9% 63.7% 41.1% 57.9% 39.2% 53.4% 40.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 7/38 1.0 4.9 42.9% 51.0% 42.0% 28.6% 37.0% 46.0% 47.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2006 17/28 3.3 5.5 52.7% 63.5% 46.6% 60.8% 57.7% 55.2% 43.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2007 7/9 2.4 6.0 50.3% 65.9% 41.1% 64.4% 45.9% 53.6% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2008 12/14 3.9 4.6 54.4% 68.0% 47.0% 58.2% 44.7% 58.6% 45.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
24 2009 10/11 3.9 6.2 53.2% 66.7% 44.2% 44.0% 40.1% 56.3% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
25 2010 19/20 4.6 4.8 51.2% 70.9% 48.0% 46.1% 35.3% 59.7% 39.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
26 2011 1/1 8.0 11.0 54.1% 67.9% 31.1% 66.7% 45.5% 51.0% 42.7% 2003 6/51 2.0 3.0 58.2% 61.2% 49.7% 35.8% 37.7% 56.3% 42.0%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 4/44 2.0 4.5 59.8% 53.6% 36.4% 48.4% 51.3% 46.9% 39.9%
28 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 9/23 1.8 3.6 58.3% 59.8% 45.3% 40.8% 52.1% 53.8% 48.0%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 3/16 1.7 2.3 62.1% 59.8% 46.6% 49.0% 41.0% 55.0% 41.7%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 21/27 1.4 4.0 59.8% 57.8% 40.3% 47.2% 47.0% 50.7% 40.6%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2008 30/35 1.1 2.9 62.5% 63.1% 46.1% 61.7% 50.8% 56.7% 42.7%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 20/22 0.8 3.4 65.8% 60.5% 46.3% 57.5% 47.3% 55.3% 42.6%
33 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 22/23 1.0 3.1 68.1% 58.7% 51.5% 55.0% 56.2% 56.1% 48.3%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 14/14 0.7 3.4 63.9% 56.7% 43.6% 34.9% 42.6% 51.9% 40.0%
35 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2012 11/11 1.0 3.5 64.1% 52.1% 45.1% 43.9% 58.9% 49.2% 41.3%
38 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2015 1/1 0.0 4.0 67.2% 51.3% 36.8% 50.0% 50.0% 46.6% 30.9%
Career — 82/197 3.5 5.4 51.7% 65.4% 44.9% 52.0% 43.2% 55.6% 41.9% — 141/544 1.1 3.3 63.2% 59.0% 45.5% 50.7% 49.7% 53.9% 43.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Karolina Sprem Tamarine Tanasugarn
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1993 1483 96.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.17
17 2002 1483 93.8 — — — — — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — +0.14 1994 1493 103.5 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.83 1–1 — — +0.06
18 2003 1604 127.0 -1.05 -1.09 0.686 41.7% — +85 — 51.0% +0.04 8–3 (73%) 2–3 (40%) 108.1 -0.54 1995 1479 101.3 — — — — +23 — — 29.4% -1.53 2–1 (67%) 1–2 (33%) 100.8 +0.28
19 2004 1761 145.8 -0.31 -1.03 0.870 47.2% -93 -1 -10 58.1% +0.55 6–10 (38%) 6–2 (75%) 101.9 -1.22 1996 1610 124.2 — — — — +2 — — 64.3% +1.21 0–2 1–3 (25%) — +0.66
20 2005 1659 133.4 -3.79 +1.69 0.885 46.7% +25 +35 — 42.7% -0.76 5–8 (38%) 3–1 (75%) 97.8 -0.42 1997 1648 125.4 — — — — -4 -102 +9 48.3% -0.34 5–6 (45%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.65
21 2006 1626 122.4 -0.58 -0.67 0.970 49.8% -80 +129 +85 43.8% -0.23 4–6 (40%) 2–3 (40%) 95.6 -0.32 1998 1702 138.7 — — — — +13 -199 +25 48.9% -0.10 5–5 (50%) 3–4 (43%) 99.1 +1.91
22 2007 1613 105.7 -1.15 -1.26 0.864 47.0% — +130 — 47.6% -0.33 1–2 (33%) 2–1 (67%) 98.8 +0.37 1999 1634 113.0 — — — — -11 -165 +110 40.8% -0.57 3–4 (43%) 3–2 (60%) 99.4 +0.52
23 2008 1624 118.5 +1.82 +0.88 1.087 52.2% — +63 — 54.3% +0.43 2–5 (29%) 1–2 (33%) 94.8 -0.54 2000 1792 139.5 — — — — -52 -296 +110 59.5% +0.54 7–4 (64%) 6–7 (46%) 102.9 -1.30
24 2009 1569 117.7 +0.90 -2.06 0.883 47.8% -19 +54 — 40.7% -0.70 0–5 (0%) — — -0.09 2001 1698 135.6 — — — — +14 -272 +291 51.5% +0.09 8–9 (47%) 7–6 (54%) 97.5 +2.28
25 2010 1563 118.6 +2.17 -2.28 0.992 49.6% +13 -2 +117 44.4% +0.02 3–4 (43%) 2–5 (29%) 97.3 +0.13 2002 1677 130.8 — — — — +37 -232 +254 52.5% +0.01 15–10 (60%) 7–6 (54%) 101.9 +2.48
26 2011 1545 98.1 +0.35 -2.30 0.871 47.2% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.18 2003 1695 137.1 +0.58 -0.37 0.961 48.9% +45 -272 +201 54.7% +0.32 7–8 (47%) 5–6 (45%) 97.4 +0.78
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1610 121.0 -2.76 -1.27 0.751 43.8% -13 -221 +320 45.7% -0.05 2–8 (20%) 3–4 (43%) 92.4 +1.55
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1497 98.5 -0.83 +0.77 1.037 50.9% -9 -166 +399 30.6% -1.35 2–1 (67%) 0–2 — +0.91
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1585 113.8 -0.78 -1.37 0.927 47.9% -34 — +318 52.8% +0.56 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 98.4 +0.99
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1569 117.4 -2.84 -1.65 0.822 45.7% 0 -212 — 29.8% -1.54 4–3 (57%) 2–1 (67%) 103.0 -2.05
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2008 1684 130.6 +1.07 -0.63 0.987 49.9% -102 — +348 53.2% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 5–1 (83%) 104.5 -1.05
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1646 112.2 -0.30 -0.53 0.953 49.0% -110 -287 +344 46.9% -0.18 2–3 (40%) 2–1 (67%) 99.3 -0.13
33 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1732 129.8 +0.24 +3.07 1.101 52.2% -26 — +172 55.8% +0.65 5–1 (83%) 2–2 (50%) 104.9 -0.51
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1648 112.1 -1.46 -2.12 0.832 45.7% -16 — — 28.6% -1.57 — — — -0.69
35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1595 100.2 -3.00 -1.41 0.812 45.8% +29 — — 31.8% -1.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.01
38 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2015 1577 97.4 -0.66 -2.32 0.578 38.9% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — +0.05
Career — 1855 135.3 +0.29 -0.90 0.944 48.9% -39 +66 +51 48.8% -0.08 29–44 (40%) 18–17 (51%) 95.7 -1.18 — 1825 132.1 -0.71 -0.34 0.932 48.5% -6 -214 +226 48.6% -0.13 77–74 (51%) 52–55 (49%) 98.6 +1.57

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.