H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Alexia Dechaume Balleret H2H: 0-1
Alexia Dechaume Balleret holds a 1–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Alexia Dechaume Balleret leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Alexia Dechaume Balleret won the 1999 US Open first round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
Age 56
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1999* | US Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | 6-1 6-4 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Alexia Dechaume Balleret | — | — | — | 1,739 | 127 | 181 | 41.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Alexia Dechaume Balleret | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,516 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 6–10 | 37.5% | — | 1,538 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 5–14 | 26.3% | — | 1,494 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 13–11 | 54.2% | — | 1,602 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 14–18 | 43.8% | — | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 21–19 | 52.5% | — | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 12–13 | 48.0% | — | 1,704 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 6–15 | 28.6% | — | 1,585 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 7–13 | 35.0% | — | 1,577 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 15–15 | 50.0% | — | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 9–19 | 32.1% | — | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 11–18 | 37.9% | — | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | — | 1,555 | 0 | 0 |