H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 08:25 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 0-2
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 2–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 2002 Indian Wells second round 6-4 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 54
Right-Handed
169 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 8, 2002* | Indian Wells | WTA 1000 | R64 | Hard | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-4 4-6 6-1 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| May 27, 1999* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | 6-1 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | #52 | #1 | 3,768 | 2,385 | 708 | 267 | 72.6% | 4 | 7 | 0 | 1 | 17 | 29 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 15–10 | 60.0% | #81 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #54 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 31–15 | 67.4% | #18 | 1,809 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1989 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,068 | 1 | 3 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1990 | 38–14 | 73.1% | #7 | 2,081 | 1 | 5 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 56–15 | 78.9% | #5 | 2,166 | 1 | 6 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 59–15 | 79.7% | #4 | 2,288 | 1 | 8 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 72–14 | 83.7% | #2 | 2,248 | 1 | 12 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 69–9 | 88.5% | #2 | 2,333 | 3 | 20 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 47–13 | 78.3% | #3 | 2,156 | 3 | 22 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 52–16 | 76.5% | #3 | 2,106 | 3 | 24 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 45–22 | 67.2% | #9 | 2,022 | 3 | 24 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 47–17 | 73.4% | #4 | 2,039 | 4 | 26 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #17 | 1,932 | 4 | 27 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 38–18 | 67.9% | #8 | 1,930 | 4 | 27 |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 34–22 | 60.7% | #17 | 1,795 | 4 | 29 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #53 | 1,634 | 4 | 29 |