H2H data updated: 2026-10-29 00:00 UTC

Katarina Srebotnik vs Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario H2H: 0-2

Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario holds a 2–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario won the 2002 Indian Wells Open round of 64 6-4 4-6 6-1.

SLO Age 45 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0 – 2
2 main-draw meetings
ESP Age 54 Right-Handed 169 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #15 6-4 4-6 6-1 Katarina Srebotnik #60 Match data Mar 6, 2002 R64 Indian Wells Open Tier I → modern equivalent WTA 1000 Hard
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario #7 6-1 6-2 Katarina Srebotnik #72 Match data May 27, 1999* R64 Roland Garros Grand Slam Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Katarina Srebotnik — #20 2,474 1,851 226 207 52.2% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario — #1 3,768 2,384 720 271 72.7% 4 6 0 12 7 29

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Katarina Srebotnik Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
14 — — — — — — — 1986 15–10 60.0% #81 1,620 0 0
15 — — — — — — — 1987 12–13 48.0% #54 1,639 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1988 31–16 66.0% #18 1,785 0 1
17 — — — — — — — 1989 47–13 78.3% #5 2,065 1 3
18 1999 11–11 50.0% #66 1,520 0 1 1990 38–14 73.1% #7 2,080 1 5
19 2000 8–19 29.6% #120 1,449 0 1 1991 56–15 78.9% #5 2,167 1 6
20 2001 7–11 38.9% #97 1,494 0 1 1992 63–16 79.7% #4 2,283 1 8
21 2002 28–18 60.9% #36 1,724 0 2 1993 72–14 83.7% #2 2,248 1 12
22 2003 25–24 51.0% #39 1,682 0 2 1994 69–9 88.5% #2 2,333 3 20
23 2004 14–19 42.4% #87 1,604 0 2 1995 47–13 78.3% #3 2,167 3 22
24 2005 28–17 62.2% #27 1,753 0 4 1996 57–17 77.0% #2 2,117 3 24
25 2006 30–24 55.6% #23 1,786 0 4 1997 45–22 67.2% #9 2,026 3 24
26 2007 29–24 54.7% #27 1,755 0 4 1998 47–17 73.4% #4 2,034 4 26
27 2008 41–25 62.1% #20 1,834 0 4 1999 25–17 59.5% #17 1,923 4 27
28 2009 2–5 28.6% #428 1,744 0 4 2000 41–19 68.3% #9 1,932 4 27
29 2010 3–10 23.1% #317 1,622 0 4 2001 34–22 60.7% #17 1,796 4 29
30 — — — — — — — 2002 21–24 46.7% #53 1,634 4 29

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Katarina Srebotnik Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 2 2 4 50.0% 13 7 20 65.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 0 3 3 0.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 5 4 9 55.6% 26 10 36 72.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 12 5 17 70.6% 28 5 33 84.8% 4 1 5 80.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
18 1999 1 5 6 16.7% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1990 5 1 6 83.3% 21 7 28 75.0% 5 1 6 83.3% 7 5 12 58.3%
19 2000 3 9 12 25.0% 2 7 9 22.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 1991 20 4 24 83.3% 22 6 28 78.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 5 3 8 62.5%
20 2001 4 6 10 40.0% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 31 5 36 86.1% 26 7 33 78.8% 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5%
21 2002 13 8 21 61.9% 14 6 20 70.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1993 39 9 48 81.3% 27 3 30 90.0% 3 1 4 75.0% 3 1 4 75.0%
22 2003 13 12 25 52.0% 9 8 17 52.9% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 1994 38 5 43 88.4% 24 2 26 92.3% 3 1 4 75.0% 4 1 5 80.0%
23 2004 5 9 14 35.7% 8 7 15 53.3% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 1995 20 8 28 71.4% 21 3 24 87.5% 6 1 7 85.7% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2005 21 9 30 70.0% 5 6 11 45.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 1996 23 8 31 74.2% 23 5 28 82.1% 6 1 7 85.7% 5 3 8 62.5%
25 2006 19 15 34 55.9% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1997 19 11 30 63.3% 13 7 20 65.0% 8 1 9 88.9% 5 3 8 62.5%
26 2007 18 15 33 54.5% 8 6 14 57.1% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1998 28 8 36 77.8% 12 4 16 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 0 3 3 0.0%
27 2008 24 16 40 60.0% 14 6 20 70.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1999 9 8 17 52.9% 15 6 21 71.4% 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2009 2 5 7 28.6% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 22 9 31 71.0% 16 6 22 72.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
29 2010 2 6 8 25.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2001 15 15 30 50.0% 18 6 24 75.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 9 13 22 40.9% 12 11 23 52.2% — — — — — — — —
Career — 125 115 240 52.1% 82 63 145 56.6% 12 18 30 40.0% 7 11 18 38.9% — 297 118 415 71.6% 329 102 431 76.3% 57 18 75 76.0% 37 33 70 52.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Katarina Srebotnik Arantxa Sanchez-Vicario
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
14 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1620 109.9 — — — — -68 +75 — 57.1% +0.13 4–2 (67%) 4–1 (80%) 105.4 +3.20
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1987 1639 128.0 — — — — -145 +141 — 48.1% -0.35 2–2 (50%) 1–0 — +0.37
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1988 1785 156.3 — — — — -239 +151 — 67.0% +1.55 0–5 (0%) 1–3 (25%) 92.9 -0.14
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1989 2066 163.2 — — — — -271 +71 -441 74.2% +1.91 8–4 (67%) 3–1 (75%) 108.7 -3.01
18 1999 1520 114.5 — — — — -39 +131 — 48.9% -0.04 2–3 (40%) 0–2 — +1.91 1990 2081 165.6 — — — — -183 +86 -321 70.1% +1.57 7–6 (54%) 3–6 (33%) 96.5 -4.19
19 2000 1450 112.4 — — — — +45 +97 — 34.4% -0.79 2–7 (22%) 1–4 (20%) 92.6 +0.46 1991 2168 175.0 — — — — -81 +83 -252 75.0% +2.29 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) 103.4 -3.51
20 2001 1494 114.5 — — — — 0 +52 — 41.5% -0.39 2–3 (40%) 2–2 (50%) 100.5 +0.12 1992 2284 179.5 — — — — -5 +24 — 75.6% +1.86 10–8 (56%) 12–1 (92%) 107.1 -6.89
21 2002 1724 137.6 — — — — -63 -4 -229 55.9% +0.46 9–5 (64%) 2–6 (25%) 103.9 -0.69 1993 2248 179.1 — — — — -9 +146 -280 77.4% +2.28 13–3 (81%) 8–6 (57%) 104.5 -2.91
22 2003 1682 127.2 +1.15 +0.28 1.039 50.6% -14 +27 -125 47.2% -0.10 9–7 (56%) 4–6 (40%) 100.2 +0.07 1994 2334 179.3 — — — — -14 +77 -381 82.8% +2.52 12–6 (67%) 14–3 (82%) 105.3 -3.56
23 2004 1604 113.1 -1.79 +0.77 0.946 48.8% -16 +108 -137 42.3% -0.62 3–4 (43%) 0–4 (0%) 94.7 +0.35 1995 2167 167.9 — — — — -23 +257 -97 73.5% +1.92 11–5 (69%) 3–2 (60%) 99.2 -1.09
24 2005 1754 134.9 +0.20 -0.62 0.965 49.0% -3 -80 -248 58.5% +0.66 10–8 (56%) 5–4 (56%) 103.2 +0.75 1996 2118 172.0 — — — — -21 +231 +89 71.5% +1.61 13–6 (68%) 7–6 (54%) 99.0 -1.50
25 2006 1787 145.5 +3.94 +1.32 1.169 53.1% +11 -81 -227 56.3% +0.69 6–7 (46%) 4–7 (36%) 96.4 +0.95 1997 2027 162.2 — — — — -3 +132 +232 64.2% +1.13 10–9 (53%) 4–3 (57%) 97.4 +1.63
26 2007 1756 138.3 +2.15 +1.81 1.106 52.0% +9 -25 -165 53.9% +0.23 7–8 (47%) 7–4 (64%) 101.2 +0.66 1998 2035 164.7 — — — — -10 +128 +211 66.4% +1.25 16–7 (70%) 5–6 (45%) 100.2 +1.12
27 2008 1834 150.4 +5.53 +1.46 1.188 53.5% -27 +6 -230 61.6% +1.10 10–13 (43%) 4–12 (25%) 93.8 -1.06 1999 1924 153.3 — — — — +11 +138 +206 55.2% +0.49 5–2 (71%) 3–2 (60%) 100.8 -0.61
28 2009 1744 104.0 -2.58 -0.87 0.860 46.8% -29 — — 35.3% -1.12 1–2 (33%) 1–0 — -0.18 2000 1933 158.0 — — — — -18 +139 +277 62.9% +0.64 14–6 (70%) 9–0 (100%) 108.9 -1.56
29 2010 1623 113.9 -1.08 -2.93 0.858 46.9% +1 +158 — 33.3% -1.18 2–5 (29%) 2–2 (50%) 94.3 +0.29 2001 1797 144.3 — — — — -25 +299 — 56.9% +0.68 12–8 (60%) 5–10 (33%) 89.3 +1.17
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2002 1635 126.7 — — — — +18 +228 — 47.0% -0.12 5–7 (42%) 5–8 (38%) 92.1 +1.10
Career — 1852 138.0 +2.99 +1.01 1.101 51.9% -9 +24 -193 51.5% +0.22 63–72 (47%) 32–53 (38%) 91.4 +0.84 — 2385 171.0 — — — — -40 +138 -56 68.5% +1.46 151–93 (62%) 92–61 (60%) 103.1 -2.07

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.