H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Conchita Martínez Granados H2H: 2-0
Katarina Srebotnik holds a 2–0 lead over Conchita Martínez Granados in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2002 Roland Garros second round 6-1 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 50
Right-Handed
171 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 30, 2002* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R64 | Clay | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-1 6-0 | Conchita Martínez Granados | Match data |
| Apr 8, 1999* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R32 | Clay | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-3 6-0 | Conchita Martínez Granados | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Conchita Martínez Granados | #587 | #66 | 538 | 1,579 | 29 | 48 | 37.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Conchita Martínez Granados | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #110 | 1,541 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #204 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #159 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #98 | 1,502 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #107 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #150 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #112 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 3–9 | 25.0% | #152 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #321 | 1,464 | 0 | 0 |