H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Julia Schruff H2H: 0-1
Julia Schruff holds a 1–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Julia Schruff leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Julia Schruff won the 2003 Estoril fourth round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 43
Right-Handed
166 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 11, 2003* | Estoril | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Julia Schruff | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Julia Schruff | #1,200 | #52 | 536 | 1,665 | 48 | 80 | 37.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Julia Schruff | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 2003 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #117 | 1,507 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #108 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2005 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #81 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2006 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #119 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #132 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #131 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #173 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |