H2H data updated: 2026-07-25 23:01 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Karina Habsudova H2H: 0-1
Karina Habsudova holds a 1–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Karina Habsudova leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Karina Habsudova won the 2000 Sydney Olympics second round 6-3 7-6(7).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
SVK
Age 52
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2000* | Sydney Olympics | Olympics | R64 | Hard | Karina Habsudova | 6-3 7-6(7) | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,851 | 225 | 206 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Karina Habsudova | #792 | #10 | 2,022 | 1,953 | 172 | 174 | 49.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Karina Habsudova | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1990 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #124 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1991 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #54 | 1,671 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 9–14 | 39.1% | #66 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #120 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 7–12 | 36.8% | #113 | 1,627 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #31 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #56 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 38–22 | 63.3% | #11 | 1,858 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 23–23 | 50.0% | #29 | 1,754 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 | 1998 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #70 | 1,684 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 21–15 | 58.3% | #49 | 1,762 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 14–20 | 41.2% | #85 | 1,672 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,833 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #123 | 1,620 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,622 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |