H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Magui Serna H2H: 1-1
Katarina Srebotnik and Magui Serna are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Magui Serna leads 1–0 on clay, while Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2003 Toronto fourth round 6-1 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 47
Left-Handed
167 cm / 5'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 11, 2003 | Toronto | WTA 1000 | R16 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-1 7-6(4) | Magui Serna | Match data |
| May 8, 2000* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Magui Serna | 7-5 7-6(4) | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Magui Serna | #1,293 | #19 | 1,330 | 1,848 | 186 | 187 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Magui Serna | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #164 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #41 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 26–24 | 52.0% | #24 | 1,801 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 19–27 | 41.3% | #39 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 21–23 | 47.7% | #37 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 29–29 | 50.0% | #26 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #50 | 1,639 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #22 | 1,746 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #103 | 1,654 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #379 | 1,629 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |