H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Meilen Tu H2H: 1-1
Katarina Srebotnik and Meilen Tu are tied 1–1 in their WTA head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Meilen Tu leads 1–0 on clay, while Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Meilen Tu won the 2007 Berlin second round 6-3 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
USA
Age 48
Right-Handed
163 cm / 5'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 9, 2007* | Berlin | WTA 1000 | R64 | Clay | Meilen Tu | 6-3 4-6 6-3 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Oct 28, 2005* | Hasselt | WTA 500 | R16 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 2-2 (ret.) | Meilen Tu | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Meilen Tu | #1,136 | #35 | 769 | 1,692 | 103 | 163 | 38.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Meilen Tu | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1994 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #160 | 1,542 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #161 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #157 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #81 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #209 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 3–11 | 21.4% | #103 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #67 | 1,576 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #45 | 1,615 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 16–24 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,561 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 4–14 | 22.2% | #143 | 1,478 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #162 | 1,464 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,474 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2006 | 7–9 | 43.8% | #90 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 2007 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #47 | 1,625 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #630 | 1,546 | 0 | 1 |