H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 14:15 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Nathalie Tauziat H2H: 0-1
Nathalie Tauziat holds a 1–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Nathalie Tauziat leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Nathalie Tauziat won the 2001 US Open second round 7-5 1-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 58
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 30, 2001* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Nathalie Tauziat | 7-5 1-6 6-3 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Nathalie Tauziat | #126 | #3 | 2,562 | 2,033 | 546 | 330 | 62.3% | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Nathalie Tauziat | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #296 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #112 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1986 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #66 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 32–20 | 61.5% | #25 | 1,845 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 30–19 | 61.2% | #26 | 1,856 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 32–19 | 62.7% | #25 | 1,881 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 46–20 | 69.7% | #18 | 1,962 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 38–20 | 65.5% | #13 | 1,970 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 38–19 | 66.7% | #14 | 1,936 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 41–18 | 69.5% | #18 | 1,975 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 1994 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #35 | 1,850 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 27–19 | 58.7% | #27 | 1,846 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 1996 | 30–21 | 58.8% | #22 | 1,806 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 40–21 | 65.6% | #11 | 1,976 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #10 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 37–23 | 61.7% | #7 | 1,987 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 36–25 | 59.0% | #10 | 1,868 | 0 | 7 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 34–21 | 61.8% | #13 | 1,863 | 0 | 8 |