H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Paola Suarez H2H: 2-1
Katarina Srebotnik holds a 2–1 lead over Paola Suarez in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Katarina Srebotnik leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2002 Los Angeles second round 6-2 4-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
ARG
Age 50
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2002* | Los Angeles | WTA 500 | R64 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-2 4-6 6-1 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| Mar 3, 2002* | Acapulco | WTA 250 | F | Clay | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-7(1) 6-4 6-2 | Paola Suarez | Match data |
| Feb 23, 2001* | Bogota | WTA 250 | R16 | Clay | Paola Suarez | 4-6 6-2 6-4 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Paola Suarez | #525 | #9 | 2,081 | 1,916 | 223 | 180 | 55.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Paola Suarez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1993 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #197 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #114 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #122 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 12–11 | 52.2% | #62 | 1,618 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 1997 | 6–16 | 27.3% | #118 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 1998 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #80 | 1,535 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 1999 | 12–12 | 50.0% | #72 | 1,597 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 2000 | 27–22 | 55.1% | #36 | 1,677 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 2001 | 27–15 | 64.3% | #27 | 1,736 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | 2002 | 30–23 | 56.6% | #27 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 37–22 | 62.7% | #14 | 1,859 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 37–17 | 68.5% | #16 | 1,804 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #238 | 1,712 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #178 | 1,699 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #300 | 1,689 | 0 | 4 |