H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Patricia Wartusch H2H: 2-1
Katarina Srebotnik holds a 2–1 lead over Patricia Wartusch in their WTA head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Katarina Srebotnik leads 2–0 on hard courts, while Patricia Wartusch leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Katarina Srebotnik won the 2003 Hobart third round 6-1 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 47
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2003* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-1 6-2 | Patricia Wartusch | Match data |
| Jan 10, 2001* | Hobart | WTA 250 | R32 | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-3 6-4 | Patricia Wartusch | Match data |
| Jun 28, 2000* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Patricia Wartusch | 7-5 6-4 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Patricia Wartusch | #1,235 | #65 | 512 | 1,641 | 43 | 61 | 41.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Patricia Wartusch | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #257 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 1998 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #137 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #90 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2000 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #90 | 1,497 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #150 | 1,467 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 12–7 | 63.2% | #84 | 1,586 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 2003 | 8–17 | 32.0% | #153 | 1,513 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #227 | 1,515 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |