H2H data updated: 2026-08-08 02:15 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Tamira Paszek H2H: 0-1
Tamira Paszek holds a 1–0 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Tamira Paszek leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Tamira Paszek won the 2007 Dubai third round 7-5 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
AUT
Age 35
Right-Handed
165 cm / 5'5"
H2H Match Log
| Winner | Score | Loser | Match Data | Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tamira Paszek | 7-5 6-3 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data | Feb 22, 2007* | Dubai | WTA 500 | R32 | Hard |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,851 | 225 | 206 | 52.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tamira Paszek | #446 | #299 | 230 | 1,782 | 100 | 129 | 43.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Tamira Paszek | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 1–1 | 50.0% | — | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 15 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–2 | 75.0% | — | 1,599 | 0 | 1 |
| 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 15–14 | 51.7% | — | 1,730 | 0 | 1 |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 16–18 | 47.1% | — | 1,697 | 0 | 1 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 5–9 | 35.7% | — | 1,626 | 0 | 1 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #120 | 1,449 | 0 | 1 | 2010 | 9–9 | 50.0% | — | 1,642 | 0 | 2 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,494 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 19–21 | 47.5% | — | 1,654 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,724 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 18–21 | 46.2% | — | 1,676 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 2–17 | 10.5% | — | 1,476 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2004 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #87 | 1,604 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,469 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,753 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | — | 1,442 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 7–9 | 43.8% | — | 1,519 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,834 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,622 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |