H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Katarina Srebotnik vs Tina Pisnik H2H: 1-3
Tina Pisnik holds a 3–1 lead over Katarina Srebotnik in their WTA head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Tina Pisnik leads 2–0 on grass, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Tina Pisnik won the 2003 US Open second round 7-5 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
SLO
Age 45
Right-Handed
172 cm / 5'8"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 28, 2003* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Tina Pisnik | 7-5 6-0 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Jun 16, 2003 | S Hertogenbosch | WTA 250 | R16 | Grass | Tina Pisnik | 3-6 6-3 6-4 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
| Oct 26, 2002* | Luxembourg | WTA 250 | QF | Hard | Katarina Srebotnik | 6-4 6-3 | Tina Pisnik | Match data |
| Jun 14, 2000* | Birmingham | WTA 500 | R64 | Grass | Tina Pisnik | 6-4 6-2 | Katarina Srebotnik | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Katarina Srebotnik | #704 | #20 | 2,474 | 1,845 | 224 | 204 | 52.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Tina Pisnik | #592 | #29 | 1,046 | 1,721 | 91 | 117 | 43.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Katarina Srebotnik | Tina Pisnik | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #414 | 1,493 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1999 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,520 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #81 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2000 | 8–18 | 30.8% | #120 | 1,484 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #73 | 1,593 | 0 | 1 |
| 20 | 2001 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #97 | 1,512 | 0 | 1 | 2001 | 16–17 | 48.5% | #63 | 1,628 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 2002 | 28–18 | 60.9% | #36 | 1,727 | 0 | 2 | 2002 | 23–24 | 48.9% | #47 | 1,689 | 0 | 1 |
| 22 | 2003 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #39 | 1,682 | 0 | 2 | 2003 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #31 | 1,699 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2004 | 13–18 | 41.9% | #87 | 1,596 | 0 | 2 | 2004 | 8–22 | 26.7% | #131 | 1,544 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 2005 | 28–17 | 62.2% | #27 | 1,752 | 0 | 4 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #495 | 1,509 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2006 | 30–24 | 55.6% | #23 | 1,786 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #27 | 1,756 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | 41–25 | 62.1% | #20 | 1,830 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #428 | 1,740 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #317 | 1,621 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |