H2H data updated: 2026-10-20 00:00 UTC

Kate Brasher vs E Young H2H: 1-0

Kate Brasher holds a 1–0 lead over E Young in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Kate Brasher won the 1978 Hampstead round of 32 6-0 6-2.

H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Kate Brasher 6-0 6-2 E Young Match data Apr 20, 1978* R32 Hampstead WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Brasher — — — 1,734 73 61 54.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
E Young — — — 1,516 2 2 50.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Kate Brasher E Young
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,480 0 0 1978 1–1 50.0% — 1,498 0 0
1977 0–1 0.0% — 1,465 0 0 1981 1–1 50.0% — 1,484 0 0
1978 7–7 50.0% — 1,493 0 0 — — — — — — —
1979 0–4 0.0% — 1,440 0 0 — — — — — — —
1980 8–11 42.1% — 1,480 0 0 — — — — — — —
1981 29–16 64.4% — 1,622 0 2 — — — — — — —
1982 25–11 69.4% — 1,638 0 4 — — — — — — —
1983 3–5 37.5% — 1,612 0 6 — — — — — — —
1984 1–2 33.3% — 1,584 0 6 — — — — — — —
1985 0–3 0.0% — 1,531 0 6 — — — — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Career Season

Rows are aligned in career order because complete birth data is unavailable. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Kate Brasher E Young
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
1976 1481 96.5 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.46 1978 1499 96.4 — — — — — — — 50.0% -0.75 — — — +0.05
1977 1466 99.5 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — +0.21 1981 1484 99.3 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — -0.03
1978 1493 109.5 — — — — — — +18 50.0% +0.37 1–1 2–2 (50%) — +0.67 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1979 1440 92.3 — — — — — +18 — 0.0% -3.17 — — — +0.64 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1980 1481 106.8 — — — — — -8 +24 42.2% -0.47 4–3 (57%) — — +0.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1981 1622 128.1 — — — — — — -125 63.4% +0.97 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1982 1639 118.1 — — — — -125 -5 -131 64.1% +1.04 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +2.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1983 1612 104.4 — — — — — — -133 35.0% -1.20 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1984 1585 95.2 — — — — — — — 28.6% -1.43 1–0 — — +0.62 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
1985 1531 92.9 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.67 — — — +0.31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career 1735 116.9 — — — — -125 -4 -77 52.8% +0.29 17–13 (57%) 9–11 (45%) 102.6 +5.24 Career 1516 97.8 — — — — — — — 33.3% -1.17 — — — +0.67

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.