H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Kate Brasher vs Liz Gordon H2H: 0-1

Liz Gordon holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Brasher in their WTA head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Liz Gordon leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Liz Gordon won the 1981 Bournemouth 2 round of 16 6-3 6-3.

H2H
0 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Liz Gordon 6-3 6-3 Kate Brasher Match data Apr 25, 1981* R16 Bournemouth 2 WTA 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Brasher 1,734 73 61 54.5% 0 0 0 0 6 6
Liz Gordon 1,686 15 8 65.2% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Brasher Liz Gordon
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
13 1976 0–1 0.0% 1,480 0 0
14 1977 0–1 0.0% 1,465 0 0
15 1978 7–7 50.0% 1,493 0 0
16 1979 0–4 0.0% 1,440 0 0
17 1980 8–11 42.1% 1,481 0 0 1974 0–1 0.0% 1,488 0 0
18 1981 29–16 64.4% 1,622 0 2
19 1982 25–11 69.4% 1,638 0 4
20 1983 3–5 37.5% 1,612 0 6
21 1984 1–2 33.3% 1,584 0 6
22 1985 0–3 0.0% 1,530 0 6
23 1980 2–1 66.7% 1,510 0 0
24 1981 13–4 76.5% 1,644 0 2
25 1982 0–2 0.0% 1,614 0 2

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Brasher Liz Gordon
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
13 1976 1481 96.5 0.0% -3.00 +0.46
14 1977 1466 99.5 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 +0.25
15 1978 1493 109.5 +17 50.0% +0.37 1–1 2–2 (50%) +0.65
16 1979 1440 92.3 +18 0.0% -3.17 +0.70
17 1980 1481 106.8 -8 +24 42.2% -0.47 4–3 (57%) +0.76 1974 1488 90.7 0.0% -6.00 -0.10
18 1981 1622 128.1 -127 63.4% +0.97 2–5 (29%) 4–3 (57%) 97.1 +0.48
19 1982 1638 118.0 -125 -5 -130 64.1% +1.04 6–2 (75%) 2–2 (50%) 105.1 +2.77
20 1983 1612 104.4 -134 35.0% -1.20 3–1 (75%) 0–3 (0%) 100.1 +0.33
21 1984 1585 95.2 28.6% -1.43 1–0 +0.64
22 1985 1531 92.9 0.0% -2.67 +0.31
23 1980 1510 106.2 +78 100.0% +3.00 1–0 +0.51
24 1981 1644 129.5 -65 -85 71.8% +1.95 3–2 (60%) 0–1 +0.80
25 1982 1614 95.6 0.0% -3.75 +0.13
Career 1735 116.9 -125 -4 -78 52.8% +0.29 17–13 (57%) 9–11 (45%) 102.6 +5.61 1686 117.4 +78 -65 -85 65.3% +1.25 3–2 (60%) 1–1 +5.83

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.