H2H data updated: 2026-10-27 00:00 UTC

Kate Glancy vs Helena Manset H2H: 0-1

Helena Manset holds a 1–0 lead over Kate Glancy in their WTA head-to-head. They have met 1 times in main draws. Most recently, Helena Manset won the 1982 Houston Nike round of 32 6-1 6-1.

H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Helena Manset 6-1 6-1 Kate Glancy Match data Jul 15, 1982* R32 Houston Nike WTA 250 —

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Kate Glancy — — — 1,582 20 35 36.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Helena Manset — — — 1,603 16 19 45.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Kate Glancy Helena Manset
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 1975 1–2 33.3% — 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
16 1976 0–1 0.0% — 1,475 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1977 1–3 25.0% — 1,459 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1978 1–4 20.0% — 1,461 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1980 1–5 16.7% — 1,422 0 0 1981 3–2 60.0% — 1,531 0 0
21 1981 2–5 28.6% — 1,423 0 0 1982 9–7 56.2% — 1,550 0 0
22 1982 14–15 48.3% — 1,455 0 0 1983 1–5 16.7% — 1,485 0 0
24 — — — — — — — 1985 1–3 25.0% — 1,456 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 1986 2–2 50.0% — 1,470 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Kate Glancy Helena Manset
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 1975 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1976 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1977 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 0 2 2 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 1981 1 2 3 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1982 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 1982 3 5 8 37.5% 10 7 17 58.8% — — — — — — — — 1983 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 4 10 14 28.6% 12 14 26 46.2% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — 6 6 12 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Kate Glancy Helena Manset
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 1975 1492 95.3 — — — — — +24 — 33.3% -2.00 — — — +0.26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1976 1476 97.1 — — — — — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — +0.39 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1977 1460 103.9 — — — — — — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 — — +0.19 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1978 1461 102.3 — — — — +121 — — 27.3% -1.91 0–1 — — +0.18 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1980 1423 87.3 — — — — — — — 16.7% -2.75 — — — +0.28 1981 1532 105.5 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.10 — — — -0.17
21 1981 1424 99.1 — — — — +110 — — 26.7% -1.47 1–0 — — +0.43 1982 1551 113.2 — — — — +70 — — 57.6% +0.82 2–1 (67%) 3–2 (60%) 100.9 +1.30
22 1982 1455 107.3 — — — — +25 +101 — 46.2% -0.15 5–2 (71%) 2–2 (50%) 106.0 +3.23 1983 1485 97.8 — — — — +104 — — 33.3% -0.33 0–2 — — +1.23
24 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1985 1457 92.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.00 — 1–1 — +0.08
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1986 1471 95.4 — — — — — +79 — 44.4% -1.33 1–0 — — +0.41
Career — 1583 100.8 — — — — +68 +89 — 37.2% -0.95 6–5 (55%) 2–2 (50%) 103.9 +9.02 — 1603 104.0 — — — — +81 +79 — 48.6% -0.08 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) 99.4 +8.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.